Compromise Formation

Compromise Formation

Introduction

The study relates to compromise formation and is intended to show the evolution of the general theory of the neuroses demonstrated during the period from 1885 to 1939. This is certainly not an easy task due to the size and depth as this study is based on the Charles Brenner and Freudian thought, as it is important to emphasize those around the theory of neurosis.

Discussion

Sigmund Freud and Compromise Formation

The purpose of Sigmund Freud was engendering a work of thought to explain a general theory of the psyche. The theoretical starting point for such an investigation was the determination of the pathogenic cause of hysteria and wherefore of the election of a neurosis, the way job was to gather the facts to explain. Currently a neurosis is the fact intra-psychic conflict and solutions to training compromise created unconsciously. The theory of compromise formation is the best explanation for the pathogenesis, that is, “the pathogenic cause” of Freud and is most advantageous to integrate theory clinical contributions; the path of practice is the most way proper to gather facts. The theory of compromise formation is linked to the outcome of the clinical application of psychoanalytic theory tripartite model. Currently, this model of psychic functioning or structural model integrates four components of conflict that drive derivatives, unpleasant emotions such as anxiety or depression, defenses and superego manifestations.

Freud's psychoanalytic theory has two parts, the combination can be explained almost every phenomenon that takes place in the human mind. The first part, the theory of psychosexual development, a revolutionary idea that with some modifications maintained until today, namely, that adult human psyche is formed based on experiences and traumas of his childhood. For example, Freud argued that unless the father is present in the family, the child does not arise at three to six years of the Oedipus complex (a child behaves instinctive affection for his mother, while the father behaves aggressively, because it takes as his rival) and child to have an adult problem lead partner life. This theoretical knowledge was practically tested many times and today has such an impact on the legalization of children by homosexual couples (Freud, 1993).

The second part consists of Freud's structural model of personality and topographic model of the mind. Structural model divides our personality on the Id, Ego and Superego. Id represents our basic needs, impulses and instincts. Superego represents a higher moral principles, we gain experience and Ego has a regulatory function -evaluates the differences between the Superego and Id. This somewhat clumsy interpretation can be easily explained with an example: if you see a hungry child in the store a cookie, the following occurs conflict: ID want to immediately fill the need to eat a biscuit regardless of the consequences to take, Ego wants to wait for the time when no one around and then to allow Id take the biscuit. Superego wants a cracker but takes to the cashier, pay for it and then eat it up, because it combines the ideal of ...