The point when one thinks about the books Frankenstein and Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde, it might be watched that the thoughts of information and science have been profoundly settled within the psyche. In Frankenstein, for example, Mary Shelley recounts how humans have perpetually endeavored to stretch the boundaries of science throughout history. Filled with the enthusiasm to seek the answer to the secret of life, Victor Frankenstein soon understands that his thirst to recreate life go past current learning will eventually blow up in his face and agonize him all his life. Mary Shelley tells the reader what her perspectives are regarding science in her novel as she depicts it as possessing the potential to surpass the limitations as well as restrictions of human knowledge and that eventually result in the 'nightmare' of evolution (King & Goodall, 2008, p. 183). On the other hand, in the classic novel, Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde, author Robert Louis Stevenson reflects on the works of Sigmund Freud as he describes the ongoing battle between a dominant and overpowering 'superego' and a desiring 'Id' (Cartwright, 2005, p. 219). In the book, Stevenson internalizes the conflict between two opposing forces, the Self and the Other, while at the same time, emphasizing upon the how the two are the two sides of the same coin. This paper means to look at the portrayal of science in these two artistic magnum opuses.
Discussion
A standout amongst the most noticeable parts of the Mary Shelley's classic novel, Frankenstein, is that it presents the central argument to delineate the dim and miserable setting along with itemized portrayals of nature. Frankenstein is considered to be an inventive work which incorporates the subject of the hunger of man to learning. This innate lust and desire to learn is what mostly motivates a human to push past acceptable limits and this leads to nightmarish evolution (Toumey, 1992, p. 419). Her composition passes on the melancholy settings of Frankenstein and in addition a valuation for nature. A sample of a dim atmosphere is apparent in the depiction of Frankenstein's research center: “In a lone chamber, or rather unit, at the highest point of the house, and divided from the various lofts by an exhibition and staircase, I kept my workshop of soiled creation… the analyzing room and the slaughterhouse outfitted large portions of my materials,” (Bloom, 2007).
Clearly, the reader is able to watch the sepulcher-like setting of his research facility as it incorporates the “dismembering room” and “slaughterhouse” that summons a shocking picture within the minds of the audience. Nevertheless, in order to differentiate on the melancholy settings of the lab, Shelley projects strong contrasting scenes and imagery of nature. The spectator recognizes that the author depicts symbolism that marks the magnificence of nature which starkly contrasts with the dim and gloomy setting of the lab of Victor Frankenstein (Haynes, 2003, p. 245). Subsequently, Shelley's Frankenstein consolidates different aspects such as a dismal and desolate setting and the warning ...