Compare and Contrast Two Theories of Object Perception

Compare and Contrast Two Theories of Object Perception

Introduction

Object perception appears to be so effortless and immediate that it is quite challenging to understand its intricacy. For instance, let's consider the significant issue of what is an object composed of. The psychologists as well as the philosophers have occupied themselves in attempting to look for the sufficient and necessary characteristics of the objects. On the basis of the primary research, it has been explored by the researchers that the objects are defined as the bodies which display “spatio-temporal continuity”; stick together within their boundaries while they move; just move when are tapered by some other object. Relevant literature suggests that the immaterial bodies and animals are excluded from the category of objects. Also, certain bodies are excluded from the category of objects, counting in; illusory objects, holes, shadows, puddles, and images of objects, for the reason that images are two dimensional entities instead of three dimensional entities (actual objects).

The differences amongst those bodies which are counted as tangible objects and the ones which are not are crucial in case one relates to the classification of those bodies that we know or judge as being tangible objects. Nevertheless, the term object perception is employed by most of the researchers more narrowly as well as more broadly compared to its employment in the way presented above. More broadly, the term object perception is employed by the perception psychologists for the fact that it covers the procedures which;

Segregate between and integrate within the constituents in the visual input;

Allocate three dimensional structure and shape to a few amongst those constituents;

Allow the identification of the formerly viewed shaped bodies; and

Figure out the way used to focus the attention on the shaped bodies.

Therefore, the researchers typically studying visual perception employ the term object perception for three dimensional as well as two dimensional objects, inanimate as well as animate objects, and even on the illusory objects. There are a number of theories of object perception in the pertinent literature. The purpose of this essay is to present a comparison amid the two theories regarding object perception (Eysenck, 2001).

Comparison amid the Theories of Object Perception

The theories of object perception ought to impart an account of the way observers make a compensation for an extensive range of variations in the image. Despite that the theories are different in a number of respects, majority of them try to stipulate the way perpetual demonstrations of the objects are extracted from the point from which they are viewed, the procedures that are employed for the purpose of recognizing these perceptions, the format of representation employed for encoding the objects in the visual memory. In broad terms, there are two distinct approaches which have been adopted to address these problems. One classification of theories is based on the assumption that there are particular invariant indications which might be recuperated under virtually every viewing condition. This class of theories is termed as “viewpoint invariant theories” for the fact that ...