ARTICLE # 1 - CHILD PROTECTION AND SAFE GUARDING IN ENGLAND: CHANGING AND COMPETING CONCEPTIONS OF RISK AND THEIR IMPLICATIONS FOR SOCIAL WORK1
Introduction1
Critical Analysis of Methodology1
Critical Analysis of Evidence1
Evaluating Policy and Practice Implications2
Recommendations for Action2
Conclusion2
ARTICLE # 2 - LAW AND CHILD DEVELOPMENT IN UNITED STATES AND UNITED KINGDOM3
Introduction3
Critical Analysis of Methodology3
Critical Analysis of Evidence3
Evaluating Policy and Practice Implications4
Recommendations for Action4
Conclusion4
REFERENCES5
Child Protection
Article # 1 - Child Protection and Safeguarding in England: Changing and Competing Conceptions of Risk and their Implications for Social Work — (Peer Reviewed)
Introduction
During the past few decades, the debate concerning the policies related to child protection in United Kingdom has shifted in new directions. The article makes an attempt at highlighting those shifts, the motivations behind them and their consequences. Both, Labour Party and the coalition of Liberal Democrats and Conservative Parties have worked towards shifting the focus of child protection and safe guarding policies in the United Kingdom to make them more relevant to the changing demographic trends. The article also presents possible future directions and policy recommendations.
Critical Analysis of Methodology
The research is secondary in nature with a qualitative methodology. The author relies on the information and existing researches from a variety of sources and uses the same to derive conclusions regarding policy directions and shifts during the past few decades.
Experts with a predisposition towards positivistic methodology believe that quantitative methodology with a plethora of statistical data is the best approach to ensure validity and reliability in the research study. Furthermore, exclusive reliance on qualitative and secondary increases the probability of human errors and biases as the subjective perceptions, predispositions, assumptions and inclinations of the researcher impact the result and conclusions derived from the results (France, et al., 2010, p. 1194).
However, the fact is that several other studies that have aimed at exploring the policy directions in United Kingdom of child protection related policies and regulations have used a similar methodology with exclusive reliance on secondary sources to craft their findings and recommendations (Frost & Parton, 2009, p. 89).
In fact, one might compare the work of the author, in the case of this article, with that of a historian which decides to write history based on the facts that he or she deems as feasible to be fitting the narrative. However, in the process, historians, and in this case, the author of this article is likely to miss several details or elements that might appear as of paramount importance to any other observer or critic.
Critical Analysis of Evidence
Since the study depends on secondary data, there are several studies that support most of the findings derived by the studies. In fact, this particular article focuses most of its efforts at consolidating all the findings and perspectives from different experts and sources, in an attempt to build a timeline of events in the history of policymaking regarding child protection and social care services (Keenan, 2006, p. 48).
The author argues that the shift and changes in policies concerning child protection have been motivated by ...