[Change Management by Supporting Project Management]

by

Change Management and Project Management

Introduction

Perhaps the most widely discussed phenomenon in the field of organizational dynamics and development in the last 20 years, organizational change refers to the confusing set events, activities, initiatives and campaigns for companies that have one thing in common: some kind of movement from a number of thoughts or behavior in a different set of thoughts or behavior (Worren, 2007).

This movement can be distinguished in terms of scale or the size and quantity and completeness. This could involve the entire organization, or subsystem (the department or functional unit) of the organization. It may attempt to transform the entire organization, as well as in organizing the transition from the traditional hierarchy of authority involvement, flatter structure, or moving into foreign markets with a new strategy, or it may request further changes, both in the Re-organization the latest technology with the support of production, introduction of new staff personnel forms, or to identify new ways for teachers and teacher notes. Changes can also be right, try to minor problems or development, to think properly, as some things are such that the same problems do not repeat (Wheatley, 2006).

Thesis Statement

Project-based firms are emerging and thriving in many global industries.

Change

The simplest definition of change management is a movement temporarily from a relatively stable state to another is temporary stable state. Organizational changes take place with such situations, learn in which the benefits of the job functions of most people in the organization needed new behaviors and skills (Rick Massa, 2008). Major changes are all employees and may, at innovation and development of skills of people to concentrate.

Argument

However, while there is broad agreement among practitioners and organizational theorists, so that competence and modularity really make it possible for organizations to match the flexibility of the economy, there is a global project, as now, more than a hodgepodge clear paradigm (Grieves, 2006 ). To fit many different organizational experiments the label. It seems in fact that is not the other way easily, but to change it to some "migration paths" or trajectories (Burns, 2007). Co-evolution perspective of historical and comparative dimension in this sense contributed to each flight path makes sense only in deed, in particular the institutional context and in relation to a specific historical heritage (Bokeno, 2008).

After some time, project managers saw their work is organized as a process of interaction between the nature of their work, the project goal or purpose, and local restrictions. Research on new organizational forms of co-evolutionary perspective implies support this view: environmental and organizational change interaction changes over time in the web-based and historically constructed process in which projects and their global and local environment, each other (Worren, 2007). Studies in many industries shows that the current period of turbulence, environmental influences, in fact, the transition period, from the search, exploration, characterized, and a few, but the workarounds (Wheatley, 2006).

The degree of similarity between the projects impact on the transferability of practices between projects and standardize ...