BIOETHICS AND HEALTHCARE



Bioethics and Healthcare

Bioethics and Healthcare

Introduction

This paper presents an argumentative analysis of universal healthcare in relation to the bioethical paradigm. Undoubtedly, a major concern, a subject of discussion in bioethics, is related to the adequate and equitable distribution of resources to gain access to health services throughout the American population. It deals with the principle of justice that is beyond the purely clinical field hospital bioethics and expands the economy, politics and social situations that affect the communities that make up the country.

The reform and adjustment efforts with regards to the Universal Healthcare Access have encountered resistance from economic sectors and insurance monkeys are so skewed to their advantage, the "economics of health," while overlook the universal principles of social security as are the university depart, equity, equality and solidarity. Sometimes these are mentioned in the law, but are far from reality and the social context in the United States of America. Furthermore, in efforts to operate the proposed system would be against such a reality, and vainly tried to reach the adjustments sought (Thompson, 2007).

Discussion

To the extent that it deals with the study of human ethics, bioethics is related to actions that promote life. Thus, bioethics may relate to all human actions (serving rights, duties or responsibilities generated), in relation to human life, the person, the only source of rights and duties. The cultivation of human activity seeks the fullness of life and health. To the extent that the duties and rights of human beings relate to him, and care as a fundamental principle of bioethics, shall define the discipline by its formal object, such as health science of culture.

Why investigate opportunities for embryonic stem cell treatment or whether GM foods are not available to all who are going to need? Are we going to mobilize the bioethical, limited as other, more and more towards technological innovations or preserve the study of aspects less flashy, but more common, such as quality of care to date, its financial sustainability and its relevance to the aspirations of the beneficiaries? This view would avoid, perhaps, that bioethics see their role limited to legitimate, ex post developments that the market or society impose.

The support for the principle of the criterion would act similarly to care than does the moral (as management objective, central and original), on the ethics of specific human actions. In all these events, (to the extent ...