Financial Mathematics, Statistical Modelling and Regulatory Frameworks
Financial Mathematics and Statistical Modelling
Question 1
BoE interest rate
0.500%
HSBC interest rate
4.990%
(a)
75% of 650000 will be £ 487,500.00
Total amount paid will be £ 511,826.25
Total number of months
300
Monthly Payments for 25 years
£ 1,706.09
(b)
BoE interest rate increases to
4.00%
HSBC interest rate increase to
8.49%
Total amount paid will be
£ 528,888.75
Monthly payments increases to
£ 1,762.96
Total maximum amount Jeff can pay
£ 960,000.00
Rate at which Jeff will not be able to pay
1.969230769
(c )
Total amount paid will be £ 511,826.25
Maximum Amount Jeff can pay
£ 3,200.00
Shortest Length for Repaying (in Months)
160
months
Result
The rate at which Jeff shall not be able to pay the mortgage is 96.92%
Question 2
(a)
Let
x1 = Quantity of Basic type Microwave ovens
x2 = Quantity of Average type Microwave ovens
x3 = Quantity of Premium type Microwave ovens
Quantity
Profit
Basic
2000
15
Average
14
28.63
Premium
800
104.88
Maximum Profit for Microwave ovens
£ 114,304.82
Subject to the following constraints
Forming
4421
<=
4500
Machining
17498
<=
17500
Assembly
3821
<=
6500
Testing
3014
<=
4750
Demand for Basic model
2000
<=
2000
Demand for Average model
14
<=
1200
Demand for Premium model
800
<=
800
Question 2.2 (1)
Quantity
Profit
Basic
1285
15
Average
0
28.63
Premium
1000
104.88
Maximum Profit for Microwave ovens
£ 124,155.00
Subject to the following constraints
Forming
4285
<=
4500
Machining
17497.5
<=
17500
Assembly
4142.5
<=
6500
Testing
3142.5
<=
4750
Demand for Basic model
1285
<=
1000
Demand for Average model
0
<=
1200
Demand for Premium model
1000
<=
1000
Result
The profit maximizing level of Basic quality, average and premium quality are found to be 114,304.82 but because the profit margin in the premium level quality is significantly higher than the other two so if there is an increase in the demand of premium quality will certainly leads to an increase revenue as well as profit. Similarly, a decrease in the demand for Basic model left over with the maximum available hours which can be utilized to manufacture.
Question 3
Question 3
For sensitivity Analysis
7.5% UP
7.5% DOWN
Annual Demand (in units)
250000
268750
231250
Ordering Cost (in pounds)
20
21.5
18.5
carrying cost for 1 unit (in pence)
0.55
0.59125
0.50875
Carrying cost Annual
137500
147812.5
127187.5
(a)
Economic order quantity
9
units per order
(b)
EOQ (Annual Demand 7.5% UP)
9
units per order
EOQ (Annual Demand 7.5% DOWN)
8
units per order
EOQ(Ordering Cost 7.5% UP)
9
units per order
EOQ(Ordering Cost 7.5% DOWN)
8
units per order
EOQ(Carrying Cost 7.5% UP)
8
units per order
EOQ(Carrying Cost 7.5% DOWN)
9
units per order
Results
The EOQ when there is an increase or decrease in the annual demand and ordering cost to 7.5% does not imposing any change in the optimal quantity ordered. However when the carrying cost is down to 7.5%, the optimal ordering quantity is the highest i.e. with the decreasing cost same number of units can be ordered leading to higher revenues and therefore higher profits at the end. Thus, the company should initiate to lower its cost to increase the EOQ.
Question 4
Year
Country A
Country B
(in £'000)
(in £'000)
1
300
800
2
550
800
3
1,250
800
4
2,300
1,700
NPV (Country A)
$3,123.40
NPV (Country B)
$3,056.31
Discount rate
11.25%
Result
If the cost of capital remains same at 111.25% level, then Alen Inc. should go for their operations in Country A as its NPV is comparatively higher than the Country B.
Changes in Cost of Capital
Time
Discount rate
Country (A)
Country (B)
-3
8.25%
$3,406.93
$3,290.46
-2
9.25%
$3,308.54
$3,209.38
-1
10.25%
$3,214.09
$3,131.38
0
11.25%
$3,123.40
$3,056.31
1
12.25%
$3,036.27
$2,984.03
2
13.25%
$2,952.54
$2,914.40
3
14.25%
$2,872.03
$2,847.30
Result
If the discount rates are increased or even decreased in the near future, still the NPV of country A remains higher than country B. So Alen Inc should open a new facture in Country ...