Use traditional process costing to allocate the direct materials and conversion costs per department to total bolts produced. Develop a cost per bolt for each type of fabric.
Input Area
Denim
Lightweight cotton
Heavyweight cotton
Total
Direct Cost
Direct Material
$8,000
$2,400
$20,000
$52,000
Direct Labour Cost
$660
$1,320
$920
$2,900
Overhead Costs
Machine
$40,000
Setup
$11,000
Inspection
$6,996
Total Overhead
$57,996
Volume
Units
1000
4000
2000
7000
Direct Labour Hours
33
66
46
145
Machine Hours
500
1400
1500
3400
Number of set-ups
10
25
20
55
Inspection hours
80
340
170
590
Note: As there is no beginning or ending inventories, equivalent units are equal to physical units. There is also no need for the calculation of the conversion cost per unit separately for the two departments due to the conversion cost are allocated in both departments to the number of bolts produced. With no beginning or ending inventories, the number of bolts produced is identical in the two departments (Hughes A., 2005).
Traditional Process Costing
Equivalent conversion cost
Total Conversion Costs to Accounts For
Total
Direct Labour
$2,900
Overhead
$57,996
Total
$60,896
Total Units (Bolts) to Account for
7,000
Equivalent Conversion Cost per unit
$8.70
Process Cost Report
Denim
Light weight cotton
Heavy weight cotton
Total
Number of Bolts
1,000 4,000 2,000 7,000
Direct Materials
$8,000
$24,000
$20,000
$52,000
Conversion Costs
$8,699
$34,798
$17,399
$60,896
Total Costs accounted for
$16,699
$58,798
$37,399
$112,896
Summary Of Cost Per Unit
Direct Materials
$8.00
$6.00
$10.00
Conversion Costs
$8.70
$8.70
$8.70
Total
$16.70
$14.70
$18.70
Using activity based costing, develop a cost per bolt
The following is the cost per bolt through the method of activity based costing:
Denim
Light weight cotton
Heavy weight cotton
Process Costing
$16.70
$14.70
$18.70
Activity-Based Costing
17.49
12.7
22.29
Cost Per Bolt Overstated (Understated by Traditional Process Costing)
($0.79)
$2.00
($3.59)
2. Comparison of Activity based costing and Process costing
Using Process cost method, the lightweight cotton per bolt cost was overstated. This cost can absorb costs that were incurred by the other types of fabric. This is due to the cost which incurred in process costing is first to the department and then to the product. The volume of production of light weight cotton that was 4, 000 bolts was much larger than the Denim that was 1, 000 bolts and heavy weight cotton which was 2, 000 bolts. However, as conversion cost allocation is based on the number of units instead of flow of resources which were used, hence, it is obvious that product which has more units will have comparatively more cost.
Light weight cotton production comprises of proportionally lesser set-ups than the other two products. Hence, the less cost will be allocated to the product and department. Few machines hours has also been used by Light-weight cotton so the cost of machine hours allocated to this product will be less. Additionally, the cost of direct labour used by Light weight cotton per bolt is less than the other two products. In the traditional process costing method, the two costs, direct labour and other conversion cost is allocated to the units' with no consideration to the actual labour that has been used (Duh, R., Lin, T. W., et al., 2009).
Furthermore, for management of Arafura Mills it might be useful to investigate the cost of machine set-up and try to reduce it, or decrease the set-ups numbers which ...