Artifact - Tom Randall Halloween Party Case

Artifact - Tom Randall Halloween Party Case

Step One

Summary (Helen Brook, Witness)

The information which was provided by the witness named, Helen Brooks was somehow and to some extend accurate in a way that, being a neighbor downstairs she might easily come up with the facts and with all the information about her neighbor's activities. So she did, in the case of Tom Randall's case. As she quoted in her witness statement that Tom was a party animal and most of his college mate's parties were considered as full of wild activities, which is why she was insisting the whole jury about the accurateness of the information provided by her.

Credibility Evaluation of the Witness

The proof testimony provided by the witness Helen Brook regulated in Article 128 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, is one of the most important evidence in criminal procedure. It considered proof par excellence, living proof! Here, the facts are made known the judge & jury through the narration done by someone who knows something that can help discovery of material truth. This one has the name of a witness and her function is to testify for or against the accused. The witnesses have thus a very important role in the criminal proceedings, they are possessing a knowledge allowing corroborate or destroy the version of the accused, respectively. Another essential aspect that enriches the position of the witness in process is related to the fact that, in most cases, based on statements given by the same defendant and his counsel will prepare your defense. Thus exercise the right to adversarial.

Summary (William Doyle, Witness)

Being a friend of friend, Mr. William Doyle information can not be appreciated as much as of Ms. Helen Brook because he was not completely or to any extend was noticeable and aware with the activities and the lifestyle of Tom Randall. The reason in order to support my argument is that, Mr. William Doyle was not directly connected to Mr. Tom Randall. As he was not his direct friend or something but he was just arrived at Tom's Party being a third person. So that is why his statement of witness can not be taken as much seriously as of Ms. Helen Brook who was Tom's neighbor.

Credibility Evaluation of Mr. William Doyle

In order to evaluate the credibility of Mr. William Doyle, one must be aware of with his source of connection with Mr. Tom Randall. There are several reasons behind this, in order to check the accuracy of William Doyle's statement such as; he was not a direct friend of Tom Randall. Moreover Collecting indications which make possible the reconstruction of a hypothetical past fact that allow prove or eliminate the suspicion that falls on the defendant. Likewise, the probative value of such evidence, it must meet the requirement laid down in Article 127 of the Criminal Procedure Code, except the regulation provides or else, proof is assessed according to the regulations of gratis certainty and knowledge of the person ...