ARTICLE DESCRIPTION

Article Description

[Name of the institute] Description of the articles

Case 1 is based on issues relating to inheritance. In which a man plundered a £50.000 inheritance payout from his 10-year old stepson so he could live as a country gent. Timothy Murphy, 55, looted Cameron Wood's trust fund to spend it on shooting trips, a Land Rover and pedigree dogs. The boy had been left the money after the death of his mother, Sharon. Murphy of Bury, Greater Manchester, was jailed for 12 months for fraud.

The stress of losing a loved one is never an easy matter, and it can become much more heated when inheritance or wills disputes come into play. Whether it's a matter of a piece of jewelry that has sentimental value or the disposal of a property, family members don't always agree on how to deal with inheritance issues. Timothy Murphy has looted his stepson and enjoyed the money with shooting trips, Land Rover and Pedigree Dogs. The case of Murphy can reach a compromise, mediation or arbitration, or if you disagree with the way the executor has disposed of property, you may find yourself in probate court. Probate court is where you litigate inheritance issues, including disposal of property or inheritance money. Litigating in probate court can be an expensive prospect, as you're likely to need probate attorneys to help you navigate the maze of forms and processes. This case will be handled by the high court of justice.

Case 2 is based on person need because he had stolen breed from a shop. This case states that the person has stolen due to his need and not because of his greed. If someone steals frivolously I believe it is immoral. If purses or jewelry are the items, they are most likely taken for superficial reasons.  Conversely, if someone steals because he needs the item to survive it can't be immoral.  The thief who has stolen bread from the shop in order to survive cannot be punished because he has not stolen for the sake of greediness. He may bay suffering from poverty and cannot be jailed for this reason. We as humans should be provided with the basic necessities.  If we are not, and are unable to obtain them legally, we have to resort to stealing. UK has a hierarchy courts and none of them have punishments for stealing food. There are very few cases like this one, one case which is almost like this one is “R v Morris, Anderton v Burnside [1984] AC 320”.

Role of Criminal Justice Agencies and Courts

All around the world, justice a collective reparation process involving the victim, offender, and community that seeks to repair the harms caused by a crime is steadily gaining credibility as a powerful alternative in the response to crime. According to Daniel van Ness and Karen Strong, the phrase criminal justice was launched by Albert English in 1977. Justice practices have been adopted into most criminal justice systems, especially for youth.

For several scholars, the centralizing of ...