ARGUMENTATIVE HISTORICAL ESSAY ABOUT THE MARCO POLO'S CHARACTER DESCRIPTION

Argumentative historical essay about the Marco polo's character description

Argumentative historical essay about the Marco polo's character description

Question A.

The evaluation of Marco Polo's feature and integrity is perplexing by the output of his Description of the World, which shortly became renowned as The Travels of Marco Polo. For the publication was not in writing by Polo, but narrated by him to a author of Arthurian romances entitled Rustichello of Pisa while they languished simultaneously in a Genoese gaol. But in general Marco Polo was hard-headed. His veneration for the emperor may have been steeped in his bedazzlement by power and wealth, and the Venetian was susceptible to Mongol myths about themselves, admiring even Chinggis Khan as a paragon of caringly justice. But the esteem in which he held the large khan Khubilai was not misplaced(Brennan 2009). The leader, by Polo's time, had forged the biggest and most populous domain there had ever been, and was trying to unify it with a shrewd and far-sighted tolerance. The wonders that Polo noted, of course, have gilded his publication with an aura of fantasy. Wherever he did not in person observe his subject, he increased credulous. For after the horizons of his up to designate day world the soil distorted into infinite possibility. More than a lifetime after Polo's day, the Travels of Sir John Mandeville, a ragbag of wonders and borrowings - and the most broadly read publication of its kind - was only falteringly disbelieved. So too, as Polo comes to after his direct information, his tales augment shaky with the doubts and gossip of his time: with Tibetan astrologers conjuring tempests and thunderbolts, with the realm of Gog and Magog and the ruch bird which carries off elephants then lets fall them to shatter on the ground before consuming them. And very dark magicians affected the most well renowned miracle of all: the golden cups at the feast of the large khan, which levitated back and forward at his table before the eyes of the entire court. As for Marco Polo's feature, the man who percolates through his often abrupt and impersonal judgments is at one time harshly observant and rather naive(Boyle 1971). His understanding, it appears, was a merchant's: astute in functional things, full of power and resourceful. His obsession with the pomp and refinements of court, with feasts and ritual, costume and luxury, is that both of a salesman and a dazzled courtier. But usual of his mother town, he was tolerant of other beliefs and practices. His usual dismissal of idolatry does not anything to dim his esteem for Mongol direct and Chinese life ('their method of dialogue is courteous (Marsden 2004). . . To their parents they display the utmost respect.') Like a harbinger of the new age, he is endlessly intrigued by the innovative and the different.But overhead all, there is the issue of Polo's integrity. Ever since it was in writing, his publication has initiated ...