Analysis and Application - Sentencing

Analysis and Application - Sentencing

Introduction

Highly specialized rules, goals and norms are part of bureaucratic criminal justice system. Common conception for the understanding includes the use of authority, the relationship between personal and professional interest and human right issues. Criminal justice is the academic discipline of the causes and consequences of sanctions, crime and act of violence. This paper discusses the issues of criminal sentencing and its impact on the social system. Sentencing guideline is the framework for the study of criminal issues. The constitutionality and imposition of punishment to one of the sentencing issue is highlighted. The law of Three-Strike Law, death penalties and victim impact statements is the major forces to incorporate with this subject of criminology. There is a separate section that depicts the relationship between the goals of sentencing and the importance of constitutionality. A sequential and progressive flow of information has been used for the development of issue. It concludes with the imposition of the death penalty and significance of legislative consideration for the stated sentencing.

Discussion

Nature and Context of Sentencing

The rules, guidelines and provisions commute as a sentencing law. The commencement of these sentences portrays the legality and enforcement of penalties on various crimes. State policy makers need to address these crimes for the justification at every extent of the law. Sentences are legal penalties for convicted defendants (Johnson, 2012). Homicide is one of the crimes for sentencing procession. It is the intentional killing of human being. Murder, attempted murder, manslaughter and driving causing death are four conditions of homicide. Homicide or intentional killing falls under the mandatory sentencing as a criminal decision.

The convict of this violent crime has to suffer death life sentencing. The constitutionality and punishment of convicted crime of homicide varies across the countries. It is regarded as mandatory sentencing in countries like Denmark, Australia, India, United States and many others (Kristem 1995). Discretionary sentences provide judges with time and length for case investigation. Opponents of this type of sentences disregard the judicial operations. The high rates of sentencing have revolted the argument for the influx enrolment of criminals in the jails. The judiciary are not able to make the decision is a sign of derogation for these opponents.

Sentencing Guidelines

Impact

The main objective of sentencing guideline is to maintain the consistency of criminal sentencing throughout the United States. The United States Sentencing Commission laid down these set of rules for classification of the criminal proceeding. It helps trial court judge to make complex decisions in the interest of criminal justice system. It is the function of nature of crime and history of the offender. The variety and context of circumstances

The act of murder or killing declares for the sentencing of whole life. The impact of the sentence guidelines on the homicide (intentional killing) varies from country to the seriousness of the offender. The encouragement of consistency in the guidelines determines punishment for minimum or whole life. There is a combination of faults or misconduct associated to the ...