Administrative Decision Making In The Case Of Hart

Read Complete Research Material



Administrative Decision Making in the case of HART

Introduction

In order to effectively exploit opportunities and reduce threats posed by climate change in the target area, it is necessary to identify the major stakeholders that influence the decision-making process of the target area. It is necessary to determine who should be brought to the project, how, when and why. Identified stakeholders and key players in the project can provide the necessary information, practical knowledge and experience to support the decision-making and implementation of project results. Identification of key stakeholders contribute to raising awareness about climate change, and supports decision-making process related to the account of the problem.

It is necessary to apply a differentiated approach to various stakeholders and key players: full involvement in the project or involvement in certain phases. In some cases, it is sufficient to inform the identified key figures about the project, so they gave him the necessary support and used their influence to attract other interested parties. The process of stakeholder engagement is necessary to constantly control, planning ways to use the results of this process to implement the objectives of the project.

Discussion

Then HART need to determine who else should be involved in the project, which can be used by a list of questions presented below. Ideally, HART should seek to involve in the project as much as possible the figures, with a high degree of influence on the implementation of its activities (Dietz & Stern). For information about the key figures for the project may be obtained from the experts already involved in the project, as well as by studying the structures of different organizations.

After identifying the key players need to develop a plan of action for their involvement in the project. It should be borne in mind that not all the key players should be involved fully, some fairly informed about the project and its results (Pops & Pavlak). The Action Plan includes the identification of methods and timing of interaction with identified key players. For example, HART can invite them to participate in working meetings to inform about the progress of the project, or to arrange a meeting just 2.1 to the public, or to schedule visits to the organizations concerned, etc.

It is imperative to identify the role played by various figures in the implementation of the project (scope and degree of influence), who will participate, who needs the results of the project, ...
Related Ads