War should be stop or not

Introduction

The 19th-century Prussian strategist Carl Von (1815/1976) asserts that in its broadest definition, war is a duel, a struggle of force between two adversaries. This might be the only enduring foundational characteristic shared by all wars, although Clausewitz would go on to assert that the presence of violence, chance, and policy were inseparable from the enduring nature of war, and that war is a “continuation of political intercourse, carried on with other means”. A more specific description of war that is universally applicable might not exist, but it is possible, as this chapter sets out to do, to determine some of the boundaries that separate areas that are part of war from areas that are not and thereby establish the general contours of war. Events like 11th September, 2001 attacks in New York and Washington, by their nature and violence, have caused a shock wave unprecedented urges mankind to a deep questioning, both individually and collectively. The mentality that prevails in a society is a reflection of that of all the individuals who compose it to each of us to wonder about the degree of responsibility and solidarity, or of indifference and selfishness govern our lives. We can only love, wake up and find peace and communication with ourselves and the world at the present moment.

Discussion

Americans are mobilizing against the wars that the government had started in different parts of the world. A major march is organized in New York to demand the withdrawal of U.S. troops from Iraq. Meetings are scheduled the next day to develop contacts with the members of Congress of the United States. Stop the War and present two sides of the same activity. Most of us have spent their lives trapped in projects, hopes, ambitions for the future, regrets, guilt or shame about the past. When we allow ourselves to feel fear, dissatisfaction, difficulties that have always eluded our heart softens. Stopping the war, we can embrace our pain and sorrow, joy and personal triumphs (Jomini, Pp. 57-70). We can open ourselves to the people around us. It is everyone's job. As individuals and as a society, we must move away from the pain of our speed, our addictions and our refusal to stop the war.

This terrorism can only be defeated by the United Nations (Ehrenreich, Pp. 11-36). No war and Cooperation is the path. The harmonization of actions and not nuisance is the method. We should eliminate terrorism in the sprout, overcoming among others causes, must be one of our purpose, and not the affirmation of the power of a hegemonic superpower, making us complicity in its arrogance and arbitrariness (Brooks, Pp. 646-70).

We must stop this war not only by its consequences for the civilian population. The danger of destabilization in the region, not only to save the unnecessary deaths of thousands of Americans, "especially young people," the Afghans and other nationals, not only to maintain an atmosphere of peace and international stability. We must stop this, because this war ...