The data set consists of variables that are involved in the hospitality trade for the year 2009. Four variables are encountered to find out the best results, total employment cost (dependent variable) has been correlated with other independent variables. Each variable comprises on the 12 different activity levels. The total and average values for each variable are as follow:
Number of enterprises (number)
Total turnover (£ million)
Total purchases of goods, materials and services (£ million)
Total employment costs (£million)
Total
393175
203726
110163
60566
Average
32765
16977
9180
5047
Total Employment Cost and Number of Enterprise
Symmetric Measures
Value
Asymp. Std. Errora
Approx. Tb
Approx. Sig.
Interval by Interval
Pearson's R
.964
.019
11.469
.000c
Ordinal by Ordinal
Spearman Correlation
.986
.017
18.709
.000c
N of Valid Cases
12
a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.
b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
c. Based on normal approximation.
The correlation result suggests that there exist a good relationship between the two variable i.e. total employment cost and number of enterprise. The magnitude of both correlation methods Pearson and Spearman show that the Total Employment Cost and Number of Enterprise are highly correlated and they also have association between them.
Total Employment Cost and Turn Over
Symmetric Measures
Value
Asymp. Std. Errora
Approx. Tb
Approx. Sig.
Interval by Interval
Pearson's R
.998
.002
44.698
.000c
Ordinal by Ordinal
Spearman Correlation
.993
.014
26.599
.000c
N of Valid Cases
12
a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.
b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
c. Based on normal approximation.
Correlation result between Total Employment Cost and Turn Over states that the variable are positively and extremely correlated and they posse's strong association (Blinder, 2004). The result is obvious because the theory also says that the more the employment cost and turnover are truly interdependent which means that if one of the factor increase the other will also increase and vice versa.
Total Employment Cost and Total Purchase
Symmetric Measures
Value
Asymp. Std. Errora
Approx. Tb
Approx. Sig.
Interval by Interval
Pearson's R
.993
.005
26.727
.000c
Ordinal by Ordinal
Spearman Correlation
.993
.014
26.599
.000c
N of Valid Cases
12
a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.
b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
c. Based on normal approximation.
The magnitude of the correlation result suggests that the variables are interdependent and they have a positive a strong correlation i.e. 0.993 which is very good. But as compared to the other variables this relationship is a bit weak as the other variables have shown higher relationship.
If we look at the overall result it can be said that all the variables are interdependent with Total Employment Cost, they posses high correlation and they have strong association (Blinder, 2004). The magnitude of Total Employment Cost and Total Turnover i.e. 0.998 is the best predictor for the total employment cost and also they have the highest correlation of the overall dataset.
Scatter Plot between Total Employment Cost and Total Turnover
The scatter plot between Total Employment Cost and Total Turnover shows a linear trend between the two variables (Bruszt, 2002). The plot indicates a straight line which suggests that total turnover is the best predictor of total employment cost.
Coefficientsa
Model
Unstandardized Coefficients
Standardized Coefficients
t
Sig.
B
Std. Error
Beta
1
(Constant)
119.949
168.453
.712
.493
TotalTurnOver
.290
.006
.998
44.698
.000
a. Dependent Variable: TotalEmploymentCost
The regression equation for total employment cost and total turnover can be written as:
Total Employment Cost = 119.949 + 0.290 Total Turnover
This equation can be interoperated as a 1% change in turnover will increase the total employment ...