UK LAW

UK Law and Reproductive Technology

UK Law and Reproductive Technology

Introduction

Beginning in the late XIX - early XX centuries, research on legal technology booming, helped by the growing importance of parliaments in the government of most European states and, consequently, the intensification of lawmaking, and the spread of philosophical ideas of positivism, and later - neo with their high attention to the problems of precision of language. Currently, both domestic and foreign legal science has a lot of research in the field of legal technology. The development of information technology, a concept which covers both New instruments for high-speed processing of information in terms of reproduction, mark the evolution of humans, culture and relations to each other. Besides the ability to communicate, these technologies allows to preserve the culture in various ways. They offer the possibility to set different expressions of intellectual creation, dissemination of knowledge and social knowledge. In this essay, we will study the ways in which law is changed, and we will also assess whether the law responds adequately to changes in technology and social attitudes and expectations. We have taken few areas to study the impact of law towards changes in technology and changes, in social attitudes and expectations. The evolution of humanity and thereby help ensure the protection and sustainability of human thought.

Discussion

In the field of human rights, the possibility of human cloning represents a violation of two fundamental principles that underlie all human rights: the principle of equality between human beings and the principle of non-discrimination. The definition of the legal status of the embryo and the protection of human life, as we have seen, is one of the key points of evolution and the law firm of these reproductive technologies. The European Parliament resolution of March 12, 1997 Energy reaffirms the value of human dignity and the prohibition of human cloning, stating explicitly that violates these two principles. The European Parliament since 1983 and all laws have been passed to legalize artificial procreation, even the most permissive, always have banned cloning (Tarasov 2007, 67).

Methods of legitimate technique are the most common requirements of legal science and practice of the process of creating laws and other regulations. These include, firstly, the methods, principles governing the content of the law-making activity as such (Objectivity, humanism, scientific soundness, etc.), secondly, the scientific methods of knowledge etc.), and third, other methods, which include the methods of legal science and methods of those sciences that study the subject of regulation created by regulation. The rules of legitimate technique are the requirements for the process of formulating a legal act, based on the methods of legal technology. The most urgent thing now is to harmonize the demands of scientific research essential human values. Moreover, research on cloning has an open space in the plant and animal kingdom, where truly necessary or useful to man or other living things, that the rules for protecting the animal itself and the obligation to respect biodiversity (Dudgeon and Marcia 2003, ...