TYPE 2 DIABETES

To Improve Inter-professional Communication Within the Preoperative Suite to Prevent Wrong Side, Wrong Procedure & Wrong Person Surgery by using the Joint Commission's Universal Protocol.



[Name of the institute]

Abstract

This report is an important contribution on a vital topic. As the 21st century progresses, it becomes ever clearer that substantial changes in education and training of professionals required in order to meet the changing needs of the world's population. Joint Universal Commission created to stop the continuation of the wrong site, procedure and surgery. As it is for safety reasons, its three fundamental principles include verification of procedures, making site and a time out. Wrong site, procedure and wrong person surgeries are guard events. These events can cause an unexpected death, psychological injury or it can even cause any serious physical injury, as well. Joint Universal Commission handles these events by the providing the preventions. Type 2 diabetes predominantly found in men and over 65 populations are suffering from it. This has to be treated carefully, and these patients need extra care.

To Improve Inter-professional Communication Within the Preoperative Suite to Prevent Wrong Side, Wrong Procedure & Wrong Person Surgery by using the Joint Commission's Universal Protocol.

Introduction

Long-standing, wide-ranging and mutually-reinforcing trends drove collaborative practice and IPE during the years under review, overlaid by the policies of successive governments. Professions continued to proliferate, as did specialties within them, in response to exponential growth in knowledge and technological advance. The network of potential relationships multiplied, rendering it impossible for anyone profession to understand all the roles and powers of the others with whom it might be called upon to collaborate and heightening the risk of territorial disputes.

Professional inflation accelerated. New nurses and social workers were to qualify as graduates, following in the footsteps of doctors and the allied health professions. Demarcations between professional roles and responsibilities became more blurred and more overlapping. Some professions extended their expertise, assumed greater responsibility and enhanced their academic credentials. Nursing, for example, developed extended and expanded roles while devolving less skilled tasks to assistants (Koizumi, 2009). If lessening status differentials between some professions augured well for improvements in mutual respect and collaboration in the long run, it could engender tension in the short run.

Practice continued to become more complex compounded by a cocktail of economic, social and demographic trends: extended life expectancy for people with chronic and disabling conditions reflected in the growing numbers of frail elderly people; attenuated family and community ties; diverse expectations and perceptions of health and health care in a multicultural society; and widening inequalities between rich and poor. By the end of the period under review, economic recession was affecting the lives of a growing number of individuals, families and communities to the detriment of their health and wellbeing (Whitehead & Dahlgren 2007) and putting health and social care services under added pressure.

Inter-professional models of care proliferated as different treatments introduced, for example, for cancer, cardiac disease, infertility, stroke, trauma, obesity and diabetes in rehabilitation, day surgery, out-patient, intermediate, community and hospice ...