For his theory of justice as fairness and conditions of his original position, Rawls takes no last-reasoned argument to. He thinks it is hopeless, a concept of justice alone, with a reference to fundamental, self-evident truths to justify. Although, in fact, be existing intuitions considered in its justification, but only mediated by a process of reflection in the well-considered judgments, general principles and competing conceptions of justice are weighed against each other. It is neither a conclusive justification (such as evident intuitions) is trying to still widespread intuitions are completely ignored - this approach can be used as pragmatist. The ...