THEORY EVALUATION

Theory Evaluation

Theory Evaluation

Question 1

Evaluation is to determine the effectiveness and efficiency with which resources have been used for achieving the objectives, enabling the identification of deviations and corrective measures to ensure proper compliance with budgeted targets. In planning is the set of activities that allow us to evaluate quantitative and qualitative results of the implementation of the Development Plan in a given period and the operation Planning System itself. Phase of the administrative process that allows a permanent measure progress and outcomes of programs to prevent deviations and implementing corrective measures where necessary, in order to provide feedback on the formulation and implementation.

A particular focus while evaluating is the quality policy of the institution. This assessment can also decide on the strategic coherence of the institution. Both the construction and evaluation of theories depend critically on the epistemological approach previously adopted, as this is the one that contains the parameters for designing the nature, function and structure of the theories. Thus, the concept of theory changes according to each epistemological approach.

For example, in focus 'inductive empiricist', who is convinced that there is an external reality independent of the subject who knows and that knowledge of that reality is generated from the data of sensory perception and observation, the theory is a universal finding, arithmetic and frequency, pattern of occurrence, the way in which they occurred, a finding that must then be expressed in terms of a system of laws (Johnson, 2009).

In the analysis 'rational-deductive', who is convinced that external reality is independent of the subject who knows and that knowledge is generated from the capabilities of the human brain and their powers of reasoning, the theory is a design, mental development, a device that mimics those universal and abstract structures that are responsible for observational processes apparently different from one another and which underlie the various caseloads and seemingly disparate observations and frequency of how events occur .

Finally, the approach 'interpretive-symbolic', one who is convinced that reality depends on how we see and think and that knowledge is a product of our own internal intuitions, our experiences and our own conscience The theory is still a kind of definition or translation of how social groups and individuals perceive the events from his own internality or your own conscience.

On the use of theories based on the type of research (within the diachronic trajectory of Research Programs, it is said that research descriptive theories often have the character of 'entry theory' in the sense that such studies, but typically does not build theories, is often used to define the categories, criteria and parameters under which their descriptions of the world produces. In researches there are usually explanatory 'theories of entry' and, necessarily, 'output theories' which are the end product in such studies. In contrastive or evaluative research (those that aim to determine the suitability of one or more theories) theories are precisely the object of study. They are those in which the analysis focuses the research ...