The Rich gets Richer and the Poor gets Prison

The Rich gets Richer and the Poor gets Prison

Inability in Reducing Crime

Reducing crime is a consultative approach based on research aimed at reducing crime by focusing police activity on prolific offenders, known hot spots of crime and the causes of crime. The choice to use public space surveillance systems can be primarily motivated by the desire to reduce crime in a given territory and aims to improve the perception of safety in the population.

Crime is a violation of law which eventually is a result of a conviction via governing authorities. People may define it in a different way, and it may vary from minor to major. Here, can be seen that causes for consigning a crime comprise of greed, anger, jealously, revenge, or pride. People sometimes also intend to commit a crime and carefully plan the details before hand to increase gain and decrease the risk. Theory is a plausible explanation of reality, a reasonable and informed guess as to why things are they appear (Thousam, 2009).

The theory of crime causation can be divided, representing discipline of theology, psychology, biology, and sociology. Some believe that the search for crime causation is an informal fallacy, which is to assume that no problem is adequately addressed unless its causes are eliminated. The combination of cause of phenomena is beyond the grasp of the human intellect. The impulse to seek cause is innate in the soul of man. The human intellect, with no inkling of the immense variety and complexity of circumstances conditioning a phenomenon, any one of which may be individually conceived of the cause of it, snatches at the first and most easily understood approximation, and says here is the cause. Criminal behavior is a result of compound combination of biological and social factors (Steven, 1996).

The role of deterrence is primarily concerned with offenses such as instrumental, such as theft or robbery. The video surveillance shows the most effective in preventing crimes against property, including theft and motor vehicles. In contrast, in offenses such as injury, violence or damage, the benefits appear to be more content.

Reasons

Cameras do not have a significant impact on crime in public spaces large and characterized by multiple routes of access and escape, while they are most useful when located in areas well defined, where the inputs are limited.

Video surveillance systems do not appear to have significant, positive effects ...