The truth is that the prostitute-client relationship is established because they imagine that both will benefit from the exchange. An exchange is economically possible only among people whose valuations of goods and means of exchange differ in opposite directions. When there is inequality in subjective assessments. Each one values ??the good it will acquire a greater degree than the good you already own. Therefore, both parties win because, otherwise, the agreement would be meaningless and would not take place.
The prostitute, like all of us, has the entrepreneurial function. Simultaneously waiver of other purposes and means considered less important in its own rating scale of purposes. (It is important to note the essentially subjective with the goals, means and costs) (Jeffreys). Has assessed the pros and cons of various options presented to it and has opted for the more attractive (financially or otherwise). Why then does not deserve the same rights as other professions? This discussion will attempt to give consideration to the thesis statement that the legalization of prostitution will have a positive implication that can be expected to have multilateral benefits.
Discussion
The services that the prostitute may be in exchange for money and/or other goods and services (Jeffreys). A lot of what really bothers them is that there is money involved. But why the legitimacy of an agreement will vary depending on if done with or without money? If the trade (having sex for money) does not violate anyone's rights, what right someone can step in and ban a free and voluntary agreement between two people? No specific moral choice justifies the prohibition and outlawing prostitution. In this sense, the possibility of prostitution is a right humano (Liberto). The prostitute has every right to exploit your body as you want. A notice to mariners, that is, moralists, feminists and other civil liberty: that is a right does not mean that you have to exercise (Jeffreys; Liberto; Brents & Hausbeck). At no time am recommending people into prostitution. I'm just saying it's strictly a personal decision that is not for others.
In this sense, the new law to law enforcement authorities often serves as an excuse, now, where prostitution is legal, there is no reason to control the brothels (Hayes-Smith & Shekarkhar). This one could not intervene against traffickers. This excuse is evidence of a lack of imagination: brothel operators are now required, for example, payroll taxes, pay pension contributions, health insurance contributions and unemployment contributions. Who does not commit an offense, or makes even punishable (Liberto). The investigative approaches have therefore shifted only from classic criminal law into labor law, social law or in the tax law (Miller & Haltianger). Thus we need not only the police are responsible - the co-operation with other authorities must be improved (Hayes-Smith & Shekarkhar; Brents & Hausbeck).
Since the beginning of the new millennium, several states have legalized prostitution. Canada is currently reviewing its policy towards prostitution (Wagenaar). It is therefore urgent to discuss the effects of legalization (regulation) of ...