Study objectives: To identify determinants of patient satisfaction with emergency department and to assess the properties of a satisfaction measurement questionnaire.
Design: Patient surrey, combined with routinely collected information on the circumstances of the department
Setting: Emergency department provided by an independent emergency care organization (ECO)
Participants: Consecutive sample of numbers of patients (67% response rate).
Main outcome measure: Patient satisfaction.
Predictor variables: patient age and sex, type of medical problem, time of visit, waiting time, duration of visit, perceived effectiveness of treatment.
Results: The satisfaction questionnaire was easy to administer. Factor analysis identified 3 separate dimensions of satisfaction, which pertained to the visit itself, to access and to general attitude toward the ECO. Validation tests were consistent with expectations. In multivariate analysis, older patient age and greater perceived treatment effectiveness predicted independently satisfaction scales.
Conclusion: The instrument used to measure patient satisfaction with emergency department performed well. Overall levels of satisfaction were high. Perceived effectiveness of treatment was the strongest correlate of patient satisfaction. Monitoring of patient satisfaction in emergency settings may contribute to improvements of quality of care.
Table Of Content
ABSTRACTII
CHAPTER I: INTRODUCTION1
Background1
PURPOSE OF THE STUDY3
CHAPTER II: LITERATURE REVIEW4
Patient Satisfaction in Context5
Why Pursue Patient Satisfaction?7
Demographic Variables and Patient Satisfaction9
The Big 5 Correlates With Satisfaction14
Empathy/Attitude14
Physician's Specific Correlates With Satisfaction16
Acceptable Wait Times18
Technical Competence20
Pain Management22
Information Dispensation24
Other Correlates26
Waiting times37
Communication and information42
Cultural aspects of care43
Pain and the patient experience44
The ED environment46
Dilemmas in accessing the patient experience48
CHAPTER 3: METHODOLOGY58
CHAPTER 4: RESULTS63
Satisfaction with care76
Satisfaction with information77
Satisfaction with information in terms of gender, age, nationality, diagnosis and voluntary admission77
CHAPTER 5: CONCLUSION79
APPENDIX116
STATEMENT OF AUTHENTICITY AND WORD COUNT129
List of Tables
Table 1: Mean scores and their weights.68
Table 2: Correlation coefficient and their weights.69
Table 3: Gender based assessment by patients.69
Table 4: Assessment based on marital status.70
Table 5: Assessment based on specialty.71
Table 6: Patients' experience of unpleasant encounter with caregivers at A&E.72
Chapter I: Introduction
Background
Patient satisfaction is a useful indicator of the performance of health services. Little is known about specific aspects of patient satisfaction in emergency care settings. Emergency care differs from scheduled medical care in several aspects which may affect patient satisfaction: patients are often in acute distress, providers work in stressful conditions, no established relationship exists between the patient and the provider and the patient often has little choice when selecting a particular provider. In Britain, patients tend to be less satisfied with out-of-hours care provided by a substitute physician who stands in for their usual physician. Health care systems and hospitals in particular exist as the center for patient/consumer care delivery and are the organizational hub of a much larger health care provider network. In this latter capacity the modern hospital must now compete in an ever-expanding role as the provider of outpatient/consumer care, a more competitive health care environment, as well as a the leader of the much larger comprehensive managed care system. Consequently, hospitals are providers of services, which are intangible, inseparable, variable, and perishable. Moreover, existing consumer marketing research has found that production and consumption of the service ...