The Problem of Evil and Suffering in the Book of Job
CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION
Overview
Just about any book can be better appreciated by locating it in spacetime. I always check the copyright date after reading the jacket cover and before starting the preface. Job is an exception. We are given a Hebrew manuscript, in a nondescript location in "the land of Uz", (which always reminds me of a famous fairy tale) that has no historical precedents. Then we are given no temporal help at all, no kings, no kingdoms, no other historical references.
The dialogue is reminiscent of the stories of God talking to Abram, definitely pre-Mosaic covenant, so many scholars put it in the patriarchal period. Linguistic studies of word usage suggest some influence from Edom, and place it in the south, somewhere in that millennium. It could have been written much later, say, during the monarchy, but placed in a patriarchal setting (Delitzsch, 35-39). Clues are so scarce, one might even believe that it was intentionally vague. It is as if the writer were telling us, "Forget the Mosaic Law, forget the covenant of circumcision, this could have happened to anyone, anywhere, at any time, this could have been you."
Ancient Librarians
The position of the Book of Job in the Bible reflects the difficulty that ancient scholars had when they attempted to group together similar books. Is Job a historical book, a poetic book, a prophetic book, or a wisdom book (e.g., Proverbs)? In the English Bible it is sandwiched between history and poetry using St. Jerome's order, but in previous editions it surfaced between poetry and prophets (Septuagint), or between songs and wisdom (Alexandria), or between law and history (Peshitta) (Barnes, 21-23).
Why is it so difficult to classify? Harrison writes, "The book derived its title from the Hebrew name of its principle character, and by any standard of comparison it ranks among the most significant pieces of world literature. Certainly it is unmatched in the writings of the Old Testament for its artistic character, its grandeur of language, depth of feeling, and the sensitivity with which the meaning of human suffering is explored...Pfeiffer held the book to be one ...