SWEATESHOPS

It is worthy for an investor to cover not only the functional issues of the business, but they must cover the debate of working in a sweatshop. Experts have noted the comparatively low character of the discourse which is related to the world-wide standards of labor, in which the supporters on different sides of the argument have failed to talk with each other on a number of times. The activists of labor, on the one hand, and the main economists on the other have made very little progress in accommodating their prescriptions and views on this important issue. The investors, nevertheless, have a unique point from which a reasoned middle ground can proceed. It has been observed that the multinational organizations usually give more attractive salaries as compared to the domestic organizations in the developing countries. A few economists have an opinion that the data relating to the multinational organizations usually do not deal with the fact that whether the jobs in the sweatshops are above the market average because a number of these jobs are with the contractors at the domestic level. In these articles, the author has discussed the concept of labor rights and industry of sweatshops.

Although workers, reformers, government agencies, and consumers agree that companies with sweatshops represent a serious problem, they all had different ideas about who is responsible and what should be done.

According to many workers, the problem of long hours and low wages most successfully resolved through negotiations with the owner of the company of a good board to work. Employees and owners of companies with sweatshops were going to sign the best contract.

These journalists, reformers, like Rose Pastor Stokes, supported their struggle: "... poverty, misery and insecurity - said Nat - are not created cruel God to punish us for our sins ... We are not obliged to suffer from poverty! The idea shaking the world. We, the workers, ever change it all ... We do not know how or when, but the seed had already thrown. "

Factory inspectors believed that the solution is to enact a law on the protection of workers. "Their fate will not be easier - they said - until the law does not intervene and will not help them."

However, the inspectors clearly despised those whom they intended to protect: "In New York, ever settle immigrant scum ... thousands of people live and die in this quarter, not knowing about the civilization that symbolize Broadway and 5th Avenue, and living as if they remained in some Russian village. Further ... begging, poverty and dirt, among which they live, disgust.

Even some supporters of the reforms called the Immigrant Workers' dirty class “condemning the weary worker sweatshops labor for his lack of spirituality, immorality, and stupidity, and quetching about the low level of intelligence and morality in that part of society the conditions for the existence of which barely surpass the conditions of existence of animals.

New York Consumers League, a reformist organization led by women from the middle class, believed ...