The purpose of this secondary data analysis of findings from a larger procedural pain study was to examine several factors related to pain during tracheal suctioning. In addition to tracheal suctioning, other procedures studied included turning, wound drain removal, femoral catheter removal, placement of a central venous catheter, and wound dressing change. A total of 755 patients underwent the tracheal suctioning procedure that was performed primarily in intensive care units (93%). A 0-10 numeric rating scale, a behavioural observation tool, and a modified McGill Pain Questionnaire-Short Form were used for pain assessment. Pain intensity scores were significantly greater during the tracheal suctioning procedure (M = 3.96, S.D. = 3.3) than prior to (M = 2.14, S.D. = 2.8) or after (M = 1.98, S.D. = 2.7) tracheal suctioning. Few patients received analgesics prior to or during the procedure. Surgical, younger, and non-white patients reported higher pain intensities. Although mean pain intensity during tracheal suctioning was mild, almost the half of the patients reported moderate-to-severe pain. Individualized pain management must be performed by healthcare providers in order to respond to patients' needs as they undergo painful procedures such as tracheal suctioning. the aims of this secondary analysis were to describe and compare patients' pain perception and responses across different phases of the tracheal suctioning procedure; examine relationships between patients' pain perceptions and responses to tracheal suctioning and the following factors: patient's age, diagnosis, gender, ethnicity, pre- and during-procedure analgesic and sedative use; and relate physiological data and analgesic use to tracheal suctioning pain. This paper reviews the literature relating to suctioning to identify current research recommendations for safer suctioning practice. Although there have been a number of publications relating to suctioning in recent years, few authors have examined what happens in actual practice. This paper identifies the potential pitfalls in practice and makes recommendations for future research into nurses' suctioning practices.
Table of Contents
Abstractii
Background of the Research1
Rationale for Selection of Area of Nursing Practice1
Aim of the Research2
Methodology2
Limitations3
SEARCH STRATEGY4
CHAPTER 02: LITERATURE REVIEW5
Review of the literature5
Prior to suctioning5
Assessment5
Patient preparation6
Hyperoxygenation7
Hyperinflation9
Instillation of normal saline11
Maintenance of asepsis13
During suctioning14
Catheter selection14
Depth of insertion15
Negative pressure15
Duration of procedure17
Number of passes17
Post-suctioning17
ETT Suctioning: How Does It Really Work?20
Instillation of Saline21
Frequency—How Often?22
The Role of Preoxygenation24
Insertion Depth: Is There Still Debate?25
Closed vs. Open ETT Techniques27
Hyperoxygenation28
Hyperinflation30
CHAPTER 03: METHODOLOGY33
Design & Methods33
Sample and settings36
Instruments37
Procedure37
CHAPTER 04: DISCUSSION39
Sample39
Tracheal suctioning pain39
Pain intensity39
Pain quality42
Pharmacologic interventions44
Discussion45
CHAPTER 05: CONCLUSION48
RECOMMENDATIONS51
IMPLICATION52
REFERENCES54
CHAPTER 01: INTRODUCTION
Background of the Research
Suctioning is described as the mechanical aspiration of pulmonary secretions from a patient with an artificial airway in position. In a healthy patient, the action of ciliated cells in the airways, the local immune system, and the cough reflex are essential for the destruction and removal of micro-organisms as well as clearing debris from the lungs. However, in the critically or acutely ill patient, these functions may be severely compromised, resulting in an excessive production of secretions, which may prove difficult to expectorate. Endotracheal and tracheostomy tubes form artificial airways, which bypass the normal physiological processes and inhibit the cough reflex. This leaves the respiratory tract vulnerable to ...