The paper highlights the description and theme of the quotations as given in the assignment.
1, “We found that the greater the proportion of experts a team had, the more likely it was to , disintegrate into nonproductive conflict or stalemate”.
It has been observed that the difficult and challenging tasks, which are encountering by today's business usually requires the expertise and input of people with dissimilar backgrounds and views to generate diverse nourishment that glimmers insight and improvement. We should also consider that the effects of diversity are also problematic. It has been researched that the members of team can cooperate in a more natural and easy manner if they recognize themselves in the comparable manner. The aim of author is to show the significance of integration among the experts as discrimination or favoritism can spoil the great team of experts into consequences. The differences that slow down the collaboration comprise not only race but also dependant on educational background, age and even work experience. The vast diversity means that different team members must be working with the person they know only seemingly or not acquainted. It has been analyzed that the larger proportion of stranger in a team and diversified background usually exhibit other mutual behaviors. In the similar way, the high level of education in team members are more challenging teamwork seems that belongs to them. The high percentage of experts in a team is possible to collapse into nonproductive conflict. In this way, how executives can reinforce the ability of organization to carry out complex collaborative tasks. Therefore teams have large number of dissimilar people, holding different background can certainly raise conflicts.
2, Every team needs a deviant, someone who says, “Why are we even doing this at all?”