[SINGLE-GENDER EDUCATION AND ITS Impact on THE MOTIVATION LEVEL OF MIDDLE-SCHOOL STUDENTS]
by
Acknowledgement
I would take this opportunity to thank my research supervisor, family and friends for their support and guidance without which this research would not have been possible.
DECLARATION
I, [type your full first names and surname here], declare that the contents of this dissertation/thesis represent my own unaided work, and that the dissertation/thesis has not previously been submitted for academic examination towards any qualification. Furthermore, it represents my own opinions and not necessarily those of the University.
Signed __________________ Date _________________
Abstract
The purpose of this action research investigation is to delve into the influence of single-gender education on the motivation of middle-school students. The school is classified as one that is chronically failing and for the past 15 years, there has been a major decline in student performance which reflects dismal scores on standardized test and district assessments.
Because teaching and learning happen through interaction, educators have examined inequities existing in classroom discourse patterns that may assist to gaps in achievement. Often, boys obtain more attention and distinct kinds of attention than girls. Boys are more probable to misbehave than girls, and more probable to be disciplined and sent out of the classroom (to the principal's agency, mentioned for special education, or sent dwelling for suspension from school). Differential attention and interaction is also granted to students, counting on ethnicity: African American boys are more probable to be disciplined and taken from classrooms, and students who have restricted English skill are not called on as often throughout class discussions as English proficient students.
Table of Contents
CHAPTER I - INTRODUCTION7
Problem Statement8
Purpose of Study9
Research Questions10
Significance of Study11
Definition of Terms12
Conclusion13
CHAPTER II LEADERSHIP PLATFORM14
Introduction14
Perceptions of Leadership15
Leadership Styles16
Leadership and Project Proposal22
Self-Assessment28
CHAPTER III -LITERATURE REVIEW37
Introduction37
Origination of single-gender education38
Legislation regarding single-gender classes39
Proponents of single-gender education41
Brain-based research43
Legal History of Single-Gender Public Education45
Critics of single-gender education48
Attribution theories of motivation59
Gender differences in causal attribution patterns60
Causal attributions and learned helplessness61
Contemporary expectancy-value theories63
Competency beliefs63
Value beliefs64
Self-efficacy theory67
Gender differences in self-efficacy beliefs68
Goal theories of achievement motivation70
Gender differences in achievement goal orientations71
Sources of gender differences in motivation72
Parental influences73
Schooling influences76
Sociocultural influences80
Gender differences in mathematics85
Other factors affecting gender differences in mathematics87
Gender differences on Axis language items88
Gender differences across other graphical languages items90
Theories and Research93
Principles of Attribution Theory96
Principles of Achievement Goal Theory99
Conclusion100
CHAPTER IV METHODOLOGY103
Introduction103
Research Questions104
Research Design104
Data Collection105
Participants108
Setting109
Community Demographics109
Conceptual Framework110
Data Analysis115
Cycle II116
Ethics and Confidentiality117
CHAPTER V - ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSION119
Data Analysis120
Parent survey154
Findings160
Interpretation of Findings164
CHAPTER VI: CONCLUSION165
Implications for Social Change165
Recommendations for Further Study165
Recommended General Guidelines for Students in a single gender environment167
REFERENCES173
APPENDIX A DENIESE COOPER1
APPENDIX B2
APPENDIX C9
APPENDIX D14
APPENDIX E16
Chapter I - Introduction
Research supported the notion that boys and girls enter school with both equal abilities and equal self-concepts (Lichtenstein, 1996). Studies indicate the beginning of a gender gap in the adolescent years. According to Guo and Leahy (2001), there is a strong evidence of gender differences in academic achievement by the age of 12. Guo and Leahy (2001) attributed this to a "faster rate of acceleration" in academic achievement for boys than girls, which result in the emergence of a large gender difference by junior ...