Although transformational and domestic authority have been in existence since the late 1970s (Burns, 1978; Greenleaf, 1977) and theoretical assumptions about the distinctions between the two leaders have been made as early as the 1990s (Graham, 1991), recently Parolini (2007) conducted the first empirical study study to enquire these assumptions. As lately as the turn of this 100 years, Bass (2000) suggested a distinction between the two managers in interpreting domestic leaders as going after transformational managers in choosing the desires of other ones and assisting other ones as the leader's major objective, while transformational managers aim to align their own and others' concerns with the good of the assembly, organization, or humanity yet no empirical study lives to support these assumptions.
Answer 1)
Overview of servant authority theory
Robert K. Greenleaf (1904-1990) motivated the servant authority notion amidst up to date organizational theorists (Spears, 1996). Leadership, as asserted by Greenleaf, should first and foremost rendezvous the desires of other ones (Greenleaf, 1977; Lloyd and Spears, 1996). In supplement to Greenleaf, diverse other writers espouse servant leadership as a legitimate, up to date idea for organizational leadership. For demonstration, Covey (1998) said, the servant-leadership notion is a standard, a natural regulation, and getting our communal worth schemes and individual customs aligned with this ennobling standard is one of the large trials of our lives.
The basic motivation for leadership should be a yearn to assist (Baggett, 1997; Batten, 1997; Block, 1993; Briner and Pritchard, 1998; Covey, 1990; De Pree 1997; Fairholm, 1997; Gaston, 1987; Greenleaf, 1977; Kouzes and Posner, 1993; Manz, 1998; Oster, 1991; Pollard, 1996; Rinehart, 1998; Snodgrass, 1993; Snyder et al., 1994).
Values in servant leadership
The values in leadership literature are very pertinent to servant leadership. Leaders need to “develop a worth scheme that serves” (Kuczmarski and Kuczmarski, 1995,p. 83Servant leaders claim the significant location of standards, convictions, and values in leadership (Covey, 1990; Ford, 1991). According to numerous writers, values are the centre components of servant leadership; they are the unaligned variables that actuate servant leader demeanour (Batten, 1997; Covey, 1990; Farling et al., 1999; Ford, 1991; Kouzes and Posner, 1993; Malphurs, 1996; Melrose, 1997; Nair, 1994; Rinehart, 1998). Consequently, the interior values of servant leaders yield purposeful, distinguishable leadership attributes.
Answer 2)
Trust
According to the standards in authority publications, the essential standards of good managers include honesty and integrity. These values build interpersonal and organizational believe (Bennis, ...