The regulations and legislations at State level shows deep concern with regards to an ongoing debate and argument on the subject of same sex marriage and defining the basic meaning behind the term and its limitations of context in which it is considered to be normal and rational. There is a serious confusion in state legislature regarding the fact that whether the term marriage should be limited to defining the relationship of a single man and single woman or whether gay marriages or lesbian marriages referring to same sex marriages should also be covered under the umbrella of marriage and whether it is legal and official to accept the relationship between two women or two men. The confusion and debate mostly revolved around defending the constitutional right or allowing for same sax marriage and making it legal.
Recently the Mayor of San Francisco has identified inefficiency of the civil union to present unequal solution to the problem of gay marriage. Marriage is a religious ritual and legal and civil rights has nothing to do with it. Civil unions regardless of the gender of people must consider every individual equally and provide them with equal legal and civil rights (Willis, 2004).
The struggle for civil and legal rights for gay marriages is as old as African American minority issue. Initially there was disagreement on the fact that whether marriages among people belonging to different racial background should be allowed or not and finally it was such marriages were prohibited in the year 1967 according to the ruling passed by the Supreme court show the weakness of the system .Randall is also of the same viewpoint that acceptance of gay marriages is a different story and has nothing to do with robbing them of their civil rights just because ...