Revolution

Revolution with or without Bloodshed



Revolution with or without Bloodshed

Value of life is one thing that cannot be exchanged for anything in the world. Not political, money or even bread to feed starving family. Conditions in the country or place can never be so strong that the risk of his life is the only way to change the situation. Glorious Revolution in England was a successful revolution that does not need to use violence to get there goals. There are some people though, who believe that it is necessary to use force and any possible means to win. The Cuban revolution was one such revolution, used violence in order to revolutionize. Many revolutions are similar in origin and results. They are French and Russian revolutions shared a few similarities, but there were disagreements (T. J. English, William Morrow, 2008).

This loss of life cannot be justified. In addition, the violence only leads to more and more violence, which leads to greater loss of life. There are several methods that can be used instead of violence. They include talks, using the UN peace talks, and much more. Today it is much more common to see the use of negotiation rather than violence. Results of non-violent revolution, as a rule, much more than compared to the violent ones that usually leave the countries in the accident. One turn, do not use force as a means of revolution was the Glorious Revolution in England.

Revolution in 1688 in England is often called Glorious, or Bloodless, Revolution, because it was achieved without war. For the second time in 40 years, the English monarch was deposed from his throne. In the previous instance was Charles I. In 1688 he was James II, brother and successor of Charles II. James took the throne in 1685 and, like his brother, ...