RESEARCH PHILOSOPHY

Research Philosophy

Research Philosophy

Introduction

This section presents the research philosophy, set about, conceive and methods utilised to address the research difficulty as delineated in the paper. It will be shown that inside the periods as characterised by Hussey, this research project searched to investigate and interpret (the reason of the research), through mostly qualitative methods (the process of the research) utilising deductive reasoning founded on living ideas, the function of tales and storytelling as information distributing practices (the reasoning of the research) and the conclusion is one of directed research (applying the research to a specific organisation). This is in line with the general research difficulty as recognised in the study. There are three major parts to this chapter. These are the research philosophy (5.2), research advances (5.3) and research conceive or scheme (5.4). Each will deal in turn with a short interpretation of the general research paradigm being offered and the cause for the assortment of the specific paradigm for this research project.

 

Research philosophy

For this study, choosing a general research philosophy is the alternative between two prime alternatives: between a positivist and a phenomenological philosophy. A number of authors (Easterby-Smith et al., 1991; Hussey and Hussey, 1997; Saunders 5-2 et al., 2000) have emphasized the major components of this alternative engaging research philosophy. In specific, Easterby-Smith et al. (1991:27) offer these key characteristics of the two philosophy paradigm alternatives.

Positivist paradigm Phenomenological paradigm

The world is external and target the world is communally assembled and personal Observer is unaligned Observer is part of what discerned.

Basic convictions

Science is value-free Science is propelled by human concerns Focus on details Focus on meanings Look for causality and basic regulations Try to realise what is occurrence Reduce occurrence to simplest components Look at the totality of each position

Researcher should Formulate hypotheses and then check them Develop concepts through induction from facts and numbers Preferred methods encompass Operationalising notions in order that they can be assessed Using multiple methods to set up distinct outlooks of phenomena Taking large trials Small trials enquired in deepness or over time.

Research paradigms

Given the research difficulty as delineated in the best fit was to pursue the phenomenological paradigm. This was finished identifying the next parameters recognised by Hussey and Hussey (1997:54) for this phenomenological paradigm: · It tends to make qualitative data: this would fit well with the case study set about which is clarified in part in  Data is wealthy and subjective: the qualitative facts and numbers would be wealthy by environment, and the accumulating process would be personal due to the grade of engagement of the researcher · The position is natural: the setting for this research was in a financial organisation (rather than a lab setting) Reliability is low: the likelihood of smaller reliability facts and numbers would be contradicted by the use of triangulation · Validity is high: this would be glimpsed as a outcome of the empirical facts and numbers accumulating exercise.

Research advances

Research can have components which are founded ...