The human rights Act of 2000 has been made keeping in view the different articles of the European convention on Human Rights, but it has not considered the protocols of the EHCR as such, and the protocols of the EHCR have not been given much importance in the development of the Human rights act of 2000. When we study the Human rights act, we can see that they have followed the different articles of the European convention, but there is no discussion of the protocols of the European Commission in the Human rights act. The death penalty has been abolished in UK through the Human rights act, but this thing was implemented in the European convention. The Human rights act was brought into parliament in the year 1998, and was enforced in the year 2000, and at that the time, the death penalty was not a part of the European Convention. Therefore, we can say that the Human rights act has not considered the protocols of the European convention (Allen, 2008,, 40).
Answer 2
The article 5 and the article 3 of the ECHR deal with the freedom of expression and, imply that is the right of a person not to face any torture from the law enforcing agencies of the state. The Human rights act has enabled a person to reach the court without fulfilling a long list of formalities before going on to the court. The Human rights act has enabled a person to reach the court and make an appeal that the rights, which have been given to him by the ECHR and the human rights act 2000, have been breached and could call for compensation from the breaching party. Previously, there were a number of formalities that had ...