I would take this opportunity to thank my research supervisor, family and friends for their support and guidance without which this research would not have been possible.
DECLARATION
I [type your full first names and surname here], declare that the contents of this dissertation/thesis represent my own unaided work, and that the dissertation/thesis has not previously been submitted for academic examination towards any qualification. Furthermore, it represents my own opinions and not necessarily those of the University.
Signed __________________ Date _________________
ABSTRACT
In this study we try to explore the concept of “failure of privatized water” in a holistic context. The main focus of the research is on “failure of privatized water” and its relation with “grass root organizing”. The research also analyzes many aspects of “grass root organizing” and tries to gauge its effect on “privatization of water”.
Table of content
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTii
DECLARATIONiii
ABSTRACTiv
CHAPTER 01: INTRODUCTION1
Background of the Research1
Aims and Objectives4
Research Question4
CHAPTER 02: LITERATURE REVIEW5
Technology, Engineering, and Urbanization5
Water War in Latin America7
Strategies used to stop privatization of water8
Social mechanisms8
Contemporary Political Economies of Water10
Eco-Socialism Grassroots Organizing12
Grassroots Transformative Organizing In South Africa13
Grass root organizing in Atlanta14
Public resistance to water privatization15
Role of civil society17
Political goals18
New Environmental Markets19
Varied Outcomes and Social Responses20
CHAPTER 3: METHODOLOGY22
Research Design22
Literature Search22
CHAPTER 4: DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS23
World Bank, IMF Conditions23
Privatization in Bolivia24
Privatization in Ghana25
Privatization in Atlanta, Georgia27
Ghana Fights back37
CHAPTER 5: CONCLUSION42
CHAPTER 01: INTRODUCTION
Background of the Research
“Water is the essence of life. Without water, human beings cannot live for more than a few days. It plays a vital role in nearly every function of the body”. (World Health Organization, 2003, p. 6)
Over 70% of the earth's surface is covered by water, but less than 3% of that water is fresh water. Out of that 3% freshwater, less than 1% is readily accessible for humans and ecosystems. According to the United Nations, 1.1 billion people lack access to an adequate supply of drinking water. Since water is essential to life, if anyone is denied from access to water, one is essentially deprived of life and liberty.
Private companies claim that privatization would limit those few who abused and wasted common water resources, allowing everyone to moderate their water usage. In practice, privatization often accelerated water waste and exploitation, often causing even more economic and ecological damage. Proponents of privatization argued that inefficient local bureaucracies did not have enough incentive to expand water access to rapidly bourgeoning urban populations. Since public water infrastructure has kept the price of water artificially low, farmers can freely exploit limited water resources. On the other hand, if a private company were in charge of a given water resource, they would try to conserve and reuse it as much as possible. For example, recent innovations have even perfected the water purification process to the point that they can covert toilet water into completely potable water. Unlike corrupt politicians who limit water access for political favoritism, private companies try to expand their customer base as wide as possible.
Private water corporations have identified privatizing and managing municipal water ...