POTENIAL RISK MANAGEMENT AND ASSESSMENT INFORMATION
Pre-requisite of Potenial risk Management And Assessment Information: The Role Of The Project Manager
Abstract
We present an investigation of structures for data on incorporated potenial risk Assessment and management, focusing on matters associated to ecological and wellbeing dangers of chemicals and their guideline at the EU level. By structures we realise the conceptual and procedural constructs inside which data is assimilated, processed and granted meaning. We analyze distinct facets of incorporated potenial risk data and how these are managed in distinct frameworks. We mostly address integration in relative to principle, expressly in potenial risk Assessment and potenial risk-benefit concerns, in interaction of Assessment and management, and in principle grade uncertainties. We display how the principle grade leverages the structures and therefore the grade and use of incorporated Assessments, and how they combine with new data and technical structures in EU chemicals command for example the REACH legislation. We resolve that by giving better vigilance to the environment of the structure it is likely to aim on the most vital facets of integration. In this way it is likely to evolve befitting flexible Assessments that aim on key complexities and matters without getting entrenched in minutia of secondary implication for the principle difficulty at hand.
Table of Content
ABSTRACTII
CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION1
Background of the research1
Problem Statement1
Rationale1
Aims and Objectives2
Significance2
Theoretical Frame work2
CHAPTER 2: LITERATURE REVIEW4
Evolution in risk management: from performance management to value management6
Performance management: on the ascent6
Value management: a paradigm shift8
The process of construction of the method13
Philosophical approach: the constructivist paradigm16
Contribution of decision-making theories and quality principles17
Benchmarking of other methods20
The decision-making framework method21
Frameworks for information22
Risk assessment, integrated risk assessment and risk management25
Integration in risk information frameworks27
The role of context27
Dimensions and level of integration in assessments28
Integrated Assessments of risks34
Assessment of risks34
Comparative Assessments and risk-benefit analyses36
Uncertainty management42
Information frameworks and the nature of risk assessment and management50
CHAPTER 3: METHODOLOGY52
Research Design52
Data Collection Method52
Data Analysis53
CHAPTER 04: DISCUSSION54
Philosophical approach: the constructivist paradigm56
Contribution of decision-making theories and quality principles57
Contribution of the systemic modelling of the decision-making process in design58
Benchmarking of other methods60
Contributions linked to project management and risk management methods62
The decision-making framework method62
The five principles63
Principle 1: the principle of objectification63
Principle 2: the principle of construction of finalities64
Principle 3: the principle of confrontation65
Principle 4: the principle of association of activity/finality65
Principle 5: the principle anticipation or pre-emption66
Phases, stages, objectives and checkpoints of our method66
Capacity to mobilise and motivate: give new meaning to projects68
Difficulties and limitations69
CHAPTER 05: CONCLUSION71
REFERENCES75
CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION
Background of the research
Providing information on risks is a challenging task that a project manager face. Risk concepts are used in a wide range of meanings, and different uses and users emphasize different aspects of risks. The contexts in which information on risks is used also influence its content. One common response to the challenges of risk information is to call for integrated assessments.
Problem Statement
We present an analysis of frameworks for information on integrated risk assessment and management, focusing on issues related to environmental and risks of chemicals and their regulation at the project manager ...