I would take this opportunity to thank my research supervisor, family and friends for their support and guidance without which this research would not have been possible.
Declaration
I, [….], declare that the contents of this dissertation/thesis represent my own unaided work, and that the dissertation/thesis has not previously been submitted for academic examination towards any qualification. Furthermore, it represents my own opinions and not necessarily those of the University.
Signed __________________ Date _________________
Abstract
This paper applies holistic personality theory to the concept of democratic political personality, emphasizing the importance of style of reasoning and of the functional bases of attitudes on democratic beliefs. Three subtypes-the socially adaptive, the cognitive, and the character-rooted democratic personality-are developed and analyzed to show the utility of the general concept for empirical research. Examples of each subtype are presented to emphasize the differences in styles of reasoning and in the bases of political attitudes among the types. This article emphasizes the crucial role demo-cratic political personality can play in both normative and empirical analyses; it is a useful bridging and empirical concept for studies of per-sonalities and polities.
Table Of Contents
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT2
DECLARATION3
ABSTRACT4
TABLE OF CONTENTS5
CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION1
Background of the study1
Purpose of the study2
Concept Of The Research3
Rationale5
CHAPTER 2: LITERATURE REVIEW6
Functional Bases Of Political Altitudes7
Style Of Political Reasoning9
The Socially Adaptive Democratic Personality11
The Cognitive Democratic Personality14
The Character-Rooted Democratic Personality16
The Effects of Personality20
Causes Of Political Attitudes And Beliefs22
Perceptions of Candidates' Attitudes Toward Government Policies23
CHAPTER 3: METHODOLOGY25
Research Design25
Mixed Method Research25
Research Method28
Primary or secondary / Qualitative or Quantitative28
Definition of (Qualitative/Quantitative) Research28
Quantitative Research28
Sample29
Instrument (interview/ Questionnaire)30
Informal, Conversational Interview31
General Interview Guide Approach31
Standardized, open-ended interview31
Closed, fixed-response interview32
Data Collection Method32
CHAPTER 4: DISCUSSION33
Personal Importance of Policy Issues33
The Projection Hypothesis35
Causes of Other Political Judgments38
National Issue Priorities38
News Media Agenda-Setting39
Evidence39
The Real-World Cues Hypothesis41
The Issue-Attention Cycle42
CHAPTER 5: CONCLUSION44
REFERENCES47
CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION
Background of the study
The idea of a democratic political personality has played a con-tinuing role, implicitly or explicitly, in much of the work in political science and political pyschology in the past 30 years. In normative works or in the prescriptive portions of empirical works, the concept has usually been treated as an ideal type or as a civic exemplar (e.g., Berelson et al., 1954, pp. 306-313). A democratic personality is an integral assumption for both classical and participatory democratic theory (Pranger, 1968; Pateman, 1970). A similar construct underlies much of the work on rational models of voting and issue-oriented or policy voting (Carmines and Stimson, 1980). In many works, the paragon of the good citizen has been assumed to be the democratic political personality (Knutson, 1972; Simpson, 1971). Major theoretical analyses of democratic political personality have been made by Lasswell (1951), Barbu (1956), Lane (1962), Greenstein (1965, 1968), Knutson (1972), and Sniderman (1975). A number of smaller studies have examined specific attributes associated with democratic personality; many of them will be mentioned later in this article.
A carefully articulated concept of democratic personality has its roots in the creation and description of its antithesis, the authoritarian personality. Un-fortunately, the concept of democratic personality has not received the theoret-ical and empirical attention given to the authoritarian ...