This case involves an lawyer clash of interest. Plaintiff requests this Court to enforce an unethical referral payment contract.1 like the circuit court, we refuse to perform so, and accordingly, affirm the summary disposition given encouraging defendants. We retain that the suspected bond is unethical because it violates the Michigan Rules of Professional Conduct. Furthermore, we retain that unethical contracts violate our public guideline and consequently are unenforceable.
Defendants dispute that MRPC 1.0(b) is inapplicable because defendants have not filed a cause of achievement for enforcement ...