Nonviolence is more productive than violence

Violence is more effective than violence

At first glimpse, aggression may emerge to be a superior technique for resolving confrontations or achieving yearned finishes because it has obvious and substantial strategies and weapons. Nonviolent techniques are often more difficult to visualize and there is no shortage of moral and practical dilemmas that sceptics are able to raise as impediments to taking nonviolence seriously.

Yet numerous causes can be suggested for the paid work of nonviolence: it is a tool for fighting' accessible to all, it is smallest expected to alienate adversaries and third parties, it breaks the cycle of aggression and counter-violence. it leaves open the likelihood of conversion, it double-checks that the media aim on the issue at hand rather than some tangential proceed of violence and it is the surest way of accomplishing public sympathy. Further, it is more likely to produce a constructive rather than a destructive conclusion, it is a procedure of conflict tenacity that may aim to arrive at the truth of a granted position (rather than mere triumph for one side) and it is the only procedure of labour that is reliable with the teachings of the foremost religions.

In addition there are reasons for the paid work of nonviolence that go beyond the conviction that is a helpful, or even the only 'correct' procedure of conflict resolution. Nonviolence can furthermore he the cornerstone for a way of life: it is reliable with a conviction in the underlying harmony of humankind and it is the only procedure of activity, interpersonal or political, that does not impede that path to what has often been called 'self-realization'.

Types of Nonviolence by which violence can be ignore

'Nonviolence' is an umbrella term for recounting a range of procedures for dealing with confrontation which share the widespread principle that personal violence, at smallest against other people, is not used. Gene pointed, the best renowned writer on nonviolent activity, has amassed the most comprehensive typology of nonviolence.

While this typology shows the diverse advances to nonviolence, the criteria which underpin them are still not clear. These criteria may be recognised by analyzing the two major dimensions of nonviolent action.

The first dimension (the tactical-strategic) indicates the deepness of analysis, the supreme aim and the operational time-frame which activists use. The second dimension (the pragmatic-ideological) shows the environment of the commitment to nonviolence and the approach to confrontation which activists utilise: ...