Modern Architecture and Mediterranean

Coursework II: Text Analysis Project

Introduction

Architectural modernism has separated completely from the language of architecture, the language that expressed their historical rights that created the architecture for it. Building and remained without a language of modernity and without identity “because the language is the crossing of identity,” says the German philosopher Heidegger, and we cannot adopt the air of a building does not help man to live in its historical and social development. I have the architecture reflect the concept of a national, then become arbitrary lacked personal Vamarp as Heidegger says, is “House of existence.” Although the architecture is a cell construction, it has become in the world of modernity is far from conditions that we talked about “the meeting, consensus and tranquility” (Avermaete, 2009).

To begin to address the influence of critical regionalism as an option of resistance in the ways of designing and building modern cities, we must recognize that it is really in the development of previous concepts of modernity, where there was the genesis of the proposal made by Frampton. For this reason it is from the development model proposed by the self-Enlightenment, from where we started this analysis.

We must start by clarifying that during the last century discourses about “modern” perception have varied academic, social or economic they come from, which has created an ambiguity in the concept and its implementation, but In this case we focus on the modern approach, derived from the end of the Enlightenment and the rise of protectionist liberal economies (Antoinette & Scully, 1997).

Brief explanation

The development of modern discourse in a historical context is conceived as an attempt to universalize academic, social and economic, stemming from a rising figure in the scientific and restricted in their political and pragmatic. This need to combine a rational discourse on a moral and humanistic framework, begin to shape the modern Architecture under provisions apparently less deterministic and more holistic, where the company seeks to design a comprehensive development model to effectively integrate technological advances and growing social needs. The genesis of the nation state from the early twentieth century begins to potentiate this modern discourse from the provision of universal development, which would subsequently be known as “liberating the modern Architecture, seeking to overcome the gap between scientific paradigms of understanding the world and economic and social structures in full swing, picking up one side of the model illustrated bases and other philosophical and economic trends of liberal pragmatism (Carol, 1996).

Literature review

Despite this modern development Architecture is clouded between two dichotomies indissoluble confronting the idea of ??liberation and universal, first disparate conditions between countries are beginning to set differential application systems, as inequalities in economic conditions through the productive and technological capacity of some states are beginning to generate deep crisis and sustainable development of the modern Architecture, this mainly because the country called “underdeveloped”, do not have the conditions necessary to produce and compete in a globalized world, under the free market economic ideas. The other dilemma facing the “liberating modern ...