MARIJUANA LEGALIZATION

Marijuana Legalization

Marijuana Legalization

Introduction

The reason of this paper is to talk about marijuana and compare both edges of the topic of legalizing marijuana. We have two factions fighting each other; one those who are pro marijuana and those who are anti marijuana. These two factions have been battling on this topic on the auditoriums of fairness for years. Pro marijuana legalization assemblies such as the Physician's Association for AIDS Care, National Lymphoma base contend that marijuana should be legalized in alignment to heal terminally sick patients. Among them are AIDS victims who find that marijuana stimulates their appetites so they can battle off dangerous emaciation; glaucoma sufferers who have utilized marijuana said it has prevented them from going unseeing, and cancer patients for whom it alleviates the critical nausea that is often escorts chemotherapy and sometimes makes lifesaving treatment impossible. Due to all these petitioning assemblies which show considerable evidence that marijuana can be utilized as a prescribed drug. Also numerous supports who are pro marijuana complain that morphine and cocaine are lawful and are very dangerous pharmaceuticals, that brings up the inquiry why not legalize marijuana as medical pharmaceutical which is verified to be less dangerous than cocaine and morphine. Lobbying assemblies in a San Diego, California, assembly managing group unanimously cast a vote to urge leader account Clinton and congress to end government limits against the use of marijuana for " legitiment medical use." City council women Christine kehoe said she wanted the town of San Diego "to go on the record we support the health use marijuana.; marijuana can be a pharmaceutical of necessity in the remedy of AIDS, glaucoma, cancer and multiple sclerosis.'' (Buckley, 1994: 24)

Discussion

Many bureaus which are anti marijuana such as pharmaceutical Enforcement bureau and police agencies contend that marijuana shouldn't be legalized. ...