Does Leadership Style Affect Staff Recognition Performance In Generating The Appropriate Response For The Leader?
Table of Contents
CHAPTER 01: INTRODUCTION1
Background of the research1
Problem Statement1
Aims and Objective of the study2
Research Questions2
CHAPTER 02: LITERATURE REVIEW3
Introduction3
Charismatic Leadership3
Situational Leadership3
Participative leadership4
Business Leadership4
Planned Change Process5
Diagnosis of the Situation5
Determination of the Desired Situation5
Determination of Courses of Action to Follow6
Implementation of Actions6
Evaluation of Results6
Leadership Structure7
Transactional7
Transformational8
Popularity of Transformational Leadership9
CHAPTER 03: METHODOLOGY11
Research Philosophy11
Approach of Philosophy11
Data Collection12
Primary data12
Secondary data12
Methods for Data Collection12
Interview13
Analysis of Data14
Method of Analysis15
Operationalisation15
Summary16
REFERENCES17
CHAPTER 01: INTRODUCTION
Background of the research
A high performance workforce is an important element in creating a successful business. When competitive advantage through technology, a superior product, and entry barriers is not possible, people are often what differentiate a successful organization from an unsuccessful one. Creating a high performance workforce, however, is not an easy task. Studies on human behavior within organizations have shown that the creation of a high performance workforce is complicated. Many factors affect whether or not an organization can in fact become high performing.
Human resource management (HRM) research finds that people practices correlate positively with firm performance. In addition, research suggests that high levels of employee job satisfaction link to increased employee motivation (Herzberg, 1966). High levels of motivation link to increased organizational performance. Highly engaged employees drive higher performance (Hewitt, 2004). This research suggests that employers should focus attention on motivating and engaging their employees in an effort to improve firm performance (Herzberg, 1966; Hewitt, 2004). Generational cohort differences between employees compound the complexity in creating a high performance workforce.
Problem Statement
The main rationale of the research topic is to gain a deeper understanding about the similarities and differences in the motivation of employees which may help organisations to motivate its employees and create organisational commitment.
Aims and Objective of the study
The key objectives are firstly; identify the main relationships between the leadership style of the company leaders and staff recognition performance variables in relation to the core job dimensions. Secondly, to what degree are these factors are presented in the selected organisation. Lastly, how important are these factors to the employees of the organisation.
Research Questions
The research will be based on the following research questions:
Does Leadership Style Affect Staff Recognition Performance In Generating The Appropriate Response For The Leader?
Why the impact of leadership style in generating response for the leader is positive?
Why the followers are greatly influenced by the qualities of their favorite leaders?
Why the leaders have a bit different from others, discuss all these qualities in-detailed?
How does it manifest itself and what are the barriers to recognition not affected by leadership style?
Why the relationship between staff recognition performance and response for leader is positive?
CHAPTER 02: LITERATURE REVIEW
Introduction
The literature review of the thesis is gathered from the e-books, online libraries and online newspapers. The literature review starts with the general introduction of leadership. Further the report evaluates different leadership styles and kinds of leadership. The literature review also discusses the factors that influenced on leadership process.
Charismatic Leadership
According to Aiken (2009,p. 12), charismatic leaders have the personality of being charm ...