LEADERSHIP IN THE MILITARY

Leadership in the military



Leadership in Military

A military leader leads by example, walking in front of his troops. Paradoxically, it is a visionary and a pragmatist. The military leadership has been one of the earliest forms of leadership. Men stood up and led tribes mobilized people and nations to defend or conquer territory and wealth.

Hannibal is often considered the first great military leader. He was able to recruit and mobilize troops into war against the Romans, because he knew his numbers were well below those of its opponents. Napoleon is another example of a military leader who, by his total freedom of initiative, was able to counter an Austro-Sardinian far superior in number to his. He was able, even before the confrontation, his maneuver design, plan the use of its forces and anticipate the reactions of the enemy quickly and efficiently. We see through these two historical examples for the importance of having a military leader, on the one hand, a charisma that magnetizes his troops and, secondly, an overall strategic vision, while being very pragmatic (Kolditz, 2010).

However, even if the characteristics of military leadership seem immutable conflict since the end of the Cold War shows new dares in leadership because the strategic environment and the company are completely transformed. As stated by Major David Last in Contemporary Issues in Officer Ship: A Canadian Perspective, "Peace, conflict and war have evolved and converged. In many cases, war is no longer a legitimate means to pursue our interests, which does not mean that war will disappear. In the uncertain environment that lays ahead, a general knowledge of the political and economic, military affairs and information environment in the country and among our partners will be an asset. Soldiers cannot expect to succeed if they are confined to the study of military or technical subjects.”

The application of military leadership in the midst of the business can be a literal transposition although features are common. Indeed, if the business leader must, as military leader, to adapt to a completely different and much more complex than a few decades ago, although it should also develop charisma and his skills as a strategist and visionary, the fact remains that the notion of sacrifice and commitment that have very different resonances between these two media, and that is where the military leadership makes sense.

Leaders in Military do not exist along the lines of the military leaders popularized stereotypes for entertainment in television or film most people the primary source of information on leadership in military. In fictional accounts, leadership is prone to strong as dogmatic, autocratic, and subject to legitimate authority of rank in hierarchical organizations awarded rigidly stereotyped to be. Sometimes the military stereotype portrayed as bold, colorful, aggressive, intolerant, and inflexible of bureaucracy or a key player in it, depending on the storyline or the inclinations of the writer. It is the popular cause of a leader in military to ensure that they assume that leaders do as a style, or ...