LEADERS

Leaders

Leaders

Introduction

The three most important good qualities of foremost are honor, loyalty, and putting the persons ahead of you. The first of these features, honor, is needed because you desire your persons to believe you. Besides that, you desire other managers, from other countries to believe you. If you were dishonorable no one would believe you and disgrace you, and thus disgrace your nation.

The second of these qualities is loyalty. If you weren't believed, then no one would believe you also. You would be dishonored, and likely disowned. The last of these features is putting the people (your entourage) ahead of yourself. If doing certain thing will benefit the good of your country, but may not benefit yourself as much, you should do what helps your homeland, even if it means staining for them. These are the most important, but not all of, the features you need to be a leader. If you have these three and not anything additional, you would still proceed down in annals as a large leader. (Abernethy, 2010)

Characteristics

Leadership characteristics can be generalized as either autocratic or democratic. The autocratic foremost tends to lead by administration and uses coercive power. Oppositely, the democratic leader will delegate administration and use expert and referent power to influence employees. One distinction between a mechanistic structure and an organic structure in an organization is the string of links of command. Similarly, a distinction between an autocratic and a popular leader is how conclusions are made. At the one end of the spectrum, the autocratic side, the manager makes a conclusion and broadcasts it. This is alike to the mechanistic organizational structure where there is a strict hierarchy of administration and the decision-making is centralized. At the other end of the spectrum, the popular side, the supervisor characterizes limits but permits the assembly make the decision. This is alike to the organic organizational structure where the decision-making tends to be casual and decentralized inside a relaxed hierarchy. (Adams and Instone 1984)

After equivalent the autocratic with a mechanistic structured organization and the popular style with an organic organized association, it is clear that an autocratic or a popular foremost may have adversity functioning in the oppositely organized organization. Beginning with the autocratic leader employed in an organic organization, one foremost dispute may be discovering to work on a team. Organic organizations are inclined to have numerous groups and task forces. An autocratic leader ...