Law- Criminology

Taker and Dorry Case

In the case of Taker and Dorry, the police has to be very much attentive and follow the criminology rules and regulations. The Taker is the eye witness that has seen Dorry carrying around fifty stereo. The police has to take the initial steps before getting into the case and arresting Dorry. The police have to investigate the relationship between Dorry and Taker there must be the possibility that Taker is the enemy of Dorry, and he is doing this because of the personal grudge. The police has to go through distinct phases before going to arrest Mr. Dorry.

There could be several issues that could be raised in court by the Dorry even if he is guilty. It should be noticeable that how to catch Dorry that he does not have any issue in the court except of accepting his guilt if he has done. The police has to be careful about laws and regulations.

Search Warrant

The first step should be going for the search warrant. Search warrants are judicial orders to authorize the agent of the local or federal government to search a house, shop, mart or any other suspected place. The law enforcement officers seek warrants and fill applications with competent courts. Along with the warrants applications material submitted is an affidavit detailed the information known to the police that can support the allegations that crimes have been committed.

Search warrants are issued at ex party hearings meant that defendants do not have rights to attend or even know the hearing took place (Maclin, p. 925-974).

The following case for the search and arresting the suspect may fall under The Fourth Amendment of the US Constitutions provided most of the control principle in regards of the search warrant.

The Amendment provides that, The rights of the people to be secured in their person, house, paper and effect, against unreasonable search and seizure, it should not be violated, and no warrant should be issued, but upon possible caused, supported by oaths or affirmations, and predominantly relating the place to search, and the person or thing to seized (Landynski, p.121-129).

The Supreme Court of the U.S. have the power of interpretation of Constitution. It has decided most of the cases regarding the Fourth Amendment. These cases have spelled out precisely what is requiring for the issue of a legally valid search warrant.

Search and Seizure

The word search and seizure linked with the Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitutions that prohibited irrational search and seizure by the police. These rules presupposed state actions that are the Fourth Amendment is appropriate simply if law enforcement agents and private citizens performing at the request of the police conduct the searches or seizures.

The United Sates Supreme Court has latest defined the Fourth Amendment terms search and seizure as the police intrusions upon legitimated and reasonable expectations of privacies. A subjective faith that activities or objects are private is insufficient to activate Fourth Amendment protections. The expectations of privacy should be one that, in view of ...