International Trade Law Dispute Resolution: A Comparison of the Appropriateness of Arbitration and Mediation
Table of Content
CHAPTER 01: INTRODUCTION1
Background of the Research1
Problem Statement1
Rationale2
Aims and Objectives3
Significance3
Research Question4
Theoretical Frame work4
CHAPTER 2: LITERATURE REVIEW6
Arbitration in International Trade6
Advantages of International Arbitration: what is wrong with litigation?8
Habas Sinai Ve Tibbi Gazlar isthisal Endustri AS v Sometal SAL [2010] EWHC 29 (Comm)14
Drafting an Arbitration Clause16
Intention to Arbitrate17
Institutional or Ad hoc?18
Choice of Law18
Where are we moving to?20
Will international arbitration go forward?23
CHAPTER 3: METHODOLOGY26
Research Design26
Data Collection Method26
CHAPTER 4: RESULT AND DISCUSSION27
Applications30
Controversies33
Privatization of Jurisprudence33
Inequalities of Bargaining Power34
Evaluation and Empirical Verification of Effectiveness34
Distortions and Deformations of ADR Processes35
CHAPTER 5: CONCLUSION36
REFERENCES37
ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY40
CHAPTER 01: INTRODUCTION
Background of the Research
Finding a theory of international trade is not a very precise undertaking for the simple reason that nations trade for a variety of reasons. For example: to gain economic or political dominance; to exploit quantity and quality of factor endowment; to overcome adverse geographic and climatic conditions; to satisfy certain preferences or tastes; to reduce the cost of production; or to attain health and strategic goals. These reasons for trade are not new, but their unique acknowledgement has evolved over many years.
International legal arrangements and trade law, now provide an infrastructure to uphold the tradition of free trade, which was the offshoot of eighteenth century political economic thought. Yet, as much as international economist struggled to define the concept, political scientists and judges are routinely dealing with a theory that is evidently more amorphous, a theory whose viability is unavoidably linked with cooperative action. This makes free trade and the accompanying fair trade challenging legal propositions that have troubled international trade relations for many centuries.
Problem Statement
In my thesis problems of litigation in international trade disputes will be briefly addresses and this paper will discusses aalternative dispute resolution specifically, arbitration in international trade and commercial law. Owing to the problems surrounding litigation in international trade law disputes, there has been a growth in ADR. There are many forms of ADR, such as arbitration, conciliation, and mediation and adjudication. This research concentrates on one main form of ADR: arbitration. Solely because in disputes arising from the international sale of goods, large sums and commercial stakes are often involved, and there will always be occasions on which the parties simply cannot agree as to what would constitute a 'fair' outcome. Ultimately, parties may wish to 'win' the case. However, the disadvantages of litigation, particularly in terms of cost and lack of confidentiality, will still remain.
Rationale
Often people think that a successful international legal order is linked with the development of an international system of adjudication within the model of national legal systems. However concerns that national legal system may not be a suitable model at the international level always exist. There are many other methods of dispute resolution available at the international level, called Alternative dispute resolution. Alternative dispute resolution (ADR) is attracting increasing attention in market economies, such as the USA, as a means of allowing both unionised and non-unionised employees to discuss their grievances in ...