A Critical Analysis Of The International Regulatory Response To The Global Financial Crisis Area- Are The Proposed Banking Regulation Recurrances Sufficient To Prevent A Recurrance?
Abstract
The FSF introduced new capital requirements in order to strengthen prudential oversight of capital, liquidity and risk management. The FSF's call for timely international implementation of the Basel II capital framework as the starting point for improving capital adequacy is sensible. It is submitted that the United States in particular should stick to the timetable that has since been set for implementation of Basel II. This requires Bank which fall under the Basel II regime to apply the new rules no earlier than April 2009 and no later than April 2011. This study examines how international regulatory structure and conflicts of interest among shareholders under the poor international regulatory system affected firm performance before crisis. Using 50 firms subject to outside auditing, paper finds that firms with low international regulatory concentration show low firm profitability, controlling for firm and industry characteristics. Controlling shareholders expropriated firm resources even when their international regulatory concentration was small. Firms with the high disparity between control rights and international regulatory rights showed low profitability. When the business group transferred resources from the subsidiary to another, they were often wasted, suggesting that “tunneling” occurred. In addition, negative effects of control-international regulatory disparity and internal capital market inefficiency were stronger in publicly traded firms than in privately held ones.
Table of Content
Abstractii
Acknowledgementiv
CHAPTER 01: INTRODUCTION1
Outline of Research1
Aims and Objectives2
Theoretical Framework2
Purpose of Research3
Limitations4
CHAPTER 02: LITERATURE REVIEW5
The Crisis And Corporate Sector Problems6
International regulatory structure of firms7
Determinants of firm profitability10
Control-international regulatory disparity10
Firm organization11
Financial structure11
CHAPTER 03: METHODOLOGY13
Research Design13
Measures15
Data15
Variables16
CHAPTER 04: RESULTS ANALYSIS21
Empirical tests and results22
Impact of controlling shareholders' international regulatory on firm profitability38
Yearly regression results40
Determinants of firm profitability41
Robustness tests43
Time-varying effects of international regulatory concentration44
Nonlinearity of international regulatory effects46
Expropriation in publicly traded firms48
CHAPTER 05: SUMMARY AND DISCUSSION OF RESULTS52
CHAPTER 06: CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION54
REFERENCES56
Acknowledgement
I would like to express my thanks to my advisor, for his suggestions, comments, patience and understanding. Very special thanks to my parents, my father, my mother, my brother and my sister who were continuously supporting me throughout my life and leaving me free in all my decisions. I would also like to thank my colleagues for his technical support whenever I needed. I would like to thank to Department, all the university managers, teachers and students with whom I have worked.
Icertify that the work presented in the dissertation is my own except referenced
The financial crisis has put the global and European financial stability recurrances to a momentous test. In particular, the crisis has highlighted key features of the financial market landscape, which had been possibly underestimated and need to be addressed by a new structure for financial regulation and supervision. Such features include the increasing relevance of systemic risk stemming from structural developments related to financial integration and financial innovation, as well as the close links between the financial system and the real ...