Water is most agreeable for fire suppression in large space when presentation and amount are taken into account. In this case, water type fire suppression apparatus have numerous benefits for example bigger defence locality and low suppression cost. Furthermore, it does not make toxic products. Sprinklers, as the most common suppression apparatus, have been broadly established for fire protection. However in latest years, with the expanding large space structures, the suitability of sprinkler use in such large space positions has been challenged.
Commonly, thermally triggered sprinklers are not apt for high ceiling space use. The size of the ceiling in large space will substantially sway the sprinklers in order that they will not supply productive protection. The major difficulty is the activation hold ups of the sprinklers in large spaces, especially high ceiling spaces. For demonstration, even a 5 MW fire on the atrium floor would not develop a fumes warmth high sufficient to cause the sprinklers on an atrium ceiling higher than 15 m [1 and 2]. Due to the expanse between the potential fire source and the sprinkler heads which are climbed on beside the ceiling, sprinkler activation may be too late to minimize the fire hazards or damage. Even the early suppression fast answer (ESFR) sprinklers have the suggested size limit [3, 4 and 5]. Moreover, the size may furthermore sway how much water can come to the blaze before vaporized or blown away by the fire plume [6]. In those large spaces where the combustible components are circulated dispersedly, it is furthermore not very effective to establish numerous sprinklers to cover all these materials.
Now, robotic fire monitor that can be mechanically controlled by computer and can work as a linkage apparatus in a fire detection and suppression system is evolving a more apt solution. Liu et al. and Yuan et al. have finished some early researches. Compared to a sprinkler, a fire monitor has numerous advantages. First, the most amazing benefit is that the activation time of these fire monitors is much shorter than sprinklers. They are triggered by the alert pointer granted by the fire detectors which are much more perceptive than the sprinklers' blast glass bulbs. These detectors can be conventional fire detectors or gas sensors. Second, water stream from a fire monitor has a higher pace, a larger flux and a bigger impulse so it is more productive for fire suppression. Its location type suppression may occasionally bypass the consequent deficiency initiated by sprinklers and will not origin a down high ground going of fumes [9] to threaten the inhabitants in the building. Last, a typical fire monitor has a firing variety of 50 m long, which endows it to defend much bigger locality than a sprinkler.
In this paper, a new fire searching and suppression system using such automatic fire monitors is described. These fire monitors are assembled into a larger fire detection- suppression system. After fire confirmation and seeking method, the main ...