Applicability of In-Situ Combustion and Range of Applicability Evaluation
Declaration
I …………………corroborate that this work submitted for assessment is my own and is a formulation of my own words. Any area of this paper which tends to incorporate the works of other authors in any contour (e.g. ideas, equations, figures, text, tables, programs) are properly acknowledged.
Signed……………………………………………………………..
Date………………………………………………………………..
Acknowledgements
The researcher will take this opportunity to stretch the bundle of thanks to Dr. Jim Somerville for inculcating the idea and taking the first step in regard to the project. His guidance during the course of the research has been exemplary. Plus, the amount of time and hard work rendered by Dr. Mehran Sohrabi is truly appreciated. The researcher will also like to stretch gratitude to the institute and staff members of Herriot Watt University for formulating the mechanism which tends to provide the world class teaching and research facility as this project would not have been possible without the existence of such infrastructure.
Abstract
This paper renders the existing work on In-Situ Combustion along with Steam Injection. Plus the challenges which have been met in order to decipher the processes, mechanisms of the Industry and the principles in the context of the in-situ combustion as a thermal recovery method. Moreover, the paper tends to provide the assortment of ISC team and steam injection by inculcating several factors from the model, to economics and to the engineering date prior a decision is taken in regard to the method. This paper also stretches its roots to underground coal gasification along with its nomenclature. However, the results extracted from the stimulation of ISC and steam injection were balanced again each other in regard to recovery efficiency, security, stoutness of the methods and economics. Outcomes tends to highlight the fact that recovery from ISC was relatively stood on a elevated ground as compared to EOR methods. However, different results were also balanced upon each other which can only be grasped if perceived in the whole context.
Table of Contents
Declarationi
Acknowledgementsii
Abstractiii
CHAPTER 1.01
Aims1
Background of the Project1
CHAPTER 2.03
Historical Perspective3
Brief History of Underground Coal gasification (UCG)4
Advantages of In-Situ Combustion4
Limitations of In-Situ Combustion5
CHAPTER 3.06
Methodology6
Approach to field Application7
Evaluation- In-Situ Combustion and Steam Injection.7
CHAPTER 4.08
Literature Review8
Wet Combustion8
Forward Combustion8
In Reverse combustion.11
Frame Work of Underground Coal Gasification (UCG)11
Underground Coal Gasification Process12
Chemical Reaction13
Reaction Kinetics15
Heat Transfer16
Mass Transfer17
Process Constraints18
Facilities and Equipment18
Air Compressors18
Well Design and Completion19
Operational Challenges21
Technical21
Corrosion21
Water production21
Sand Production22
Emulsion and Asphaltene Production22
Ignition of Well22
Surface facilities23
Fluid processing23
Environmental Factors23
Security Concerns24
CHAPTER 5.025
Field Modelling and Simulation25
Channelizing25
Other Solutions25
Mounting of Grid25
Emulsification26
Screening and Selection Criteria of ISC26
CHAPTER 6.029
Evaluation of ISC and Steam Injection29
CHAPTER 7.031
Outcomes31
Economics of the Project32
CHAPTER 5.033
Conclusion33
References34
Applicability of In-Situ Combustion and Range of Applicability Evaluation
CHAPTER 1.0
Aims
In-Situ Combustion is counted among those aspects of reservoir engineering where a great deal of research work has already been conducted. However, this study aspires to achieve the following objectives:
A comprehensive reassessment of the work done in the past in relation to the subject of In-Situ Combustion.
Formulating an effective and efficient methodology to be applied in-situ combustion as reservoir recovery method.
Contrasting the different perspectives of in-situ combustion against the recovery methods such as steam ...