Ideology and Criminal Justice Policy



Ideology and Criminal Justice Policy

Introduction

This paper intends to critique an article “Ideology and Criminal Justice Policy” written by Walter B. Miller in order to explore the influence of ideology on the criminal justice system. The objective behind the article critique is to research and discuss the idea that ideology is a permanent hidden agenda within the criminal justice system.

Discussion

The article talks about the transitional period United States of America has gone through. This article talks about issues concerning philosophy and legal rights policy in the U.S. The writer suggests that at the time of this article's publication, it was commonly considered that America was suffering from a major adjusting stage in which long-established social agreements and the ethical and conceptual thoughts undergirding them were going through significant changes. This report concentrates on the effect and credibility of ideological presumptions on the guidelines and the techniques of those performing legal rights work. The writer suggests that "Ideology is the permanent agenda of criminal justice" (Walter, 1973).

Ideology is also a main factor in the complicated styles of modification and balance, and a key to their knowing. Ideology and its repercussions put in a powerful impact on the guidelines and procedures of those who perform the business of legal rights, and that the degree and kinds of impact go mostly unacknowledged. Ideology is the lasting invisible plan of legal rights. The ideological positions of four major professional fields have been discussed by the author which is academic criminology, the police, the judiciary, and corrections. Probably the most important aspect in academic criminologists is that the day-to-day ideological environment of the regular academic criminologist, regarded within the viewpoint of the finish group, is artificial; it reveals the opinions of a deviant and unrepresentative group.

Moving on to the police, among public safety authorities, variations in ideological races are found in different areas (for example, Western Shore divisions generally have higher ratios of well trained employees), different scaled areas, and divisions with different employees guidelines. Within divisions, age variations may be important (some youthful authorities are less rightist), as well as variations in position and job description (Walter, 1973).

The legal organizations are probably recognized by higher ideological variety than either the cops or improvements. The most generous of all judges are usually discovered in government and higher-level state lawful courts, but traditional opinions are still typical among jurists of the reduced ...