HEALTH CARE

Health Care



Health Care

EDITORIAL: Silencing opposition to government health care

The editorial stated that Proponents of for-profit enterprise in health care support their position by maintaining that all persons have a basic right to freedom and thus a right to use their property in ways they freely choose. They argue that owners of for-profits have no special obligation to provide free services to the poor, if they are not covered by insurance. They think that it is being wrongly assumed that for-profits impose a burden on non-profits by not taking the costs of caring for the poor. They say that they, unlike non-profit, have to pay taxes, and in doing so, can be said to pay their share in serving the poor through tax-supported public programs. For-profit proponents also would like to argue the health care is a lot like food, clothing and shelter. Just as these "basic needs" are sold on the market and distributed according to ability to pay, so too should health care. They think that if some cannot afford to pay for such basic needs, it is up to the government or voluntary agencies to see that they secure it.

A most of Americans are against present designs to elaborate government's power over wellbeing care. "Many older people have arrive to depend on [Medicare Advantage] treatment, and abruptly strolling away from it, I believe, is unconscionable," Sen. Bill Nelson, Florida Democrat, said on Tuesday. He was commenting on the wellbeing care account suggested by Sen. Max Baucus, Montana Democrat. Mr. Nelson's answer is understandable. Medicare Advantage values part of an enrollee's Medicare advantages to offer supplemental benefits. Some designs limit members' annual out-of-pocket expending on health care, covering health charges overhead a preset limit, state $5,000. Plans offer everything from dental treatment to dream treatment to other services ...