The H-1B visa program opened the US information technology labor market to temporary, skilled immigrant labor. But the immigrant worker was bound to a specific employer for the duration of the visa. The paper also discusses about the Caribbean education in a holistic context from its past to present status. It focuses on the Caribbean education in the relationship of education. The non-portability of the H-l B visa has benefitted the employer at the expense of immigrant and domestic workers. Much of the political debate surrounding the H-1B program has focused on raising the annual visa cap based on inconclusive evidence of a domestic IT labor shortage. The labor shortage question has obscured the more important issue of reforming the H-lB program to level the playing field between business and labor.
Table of Contents
Abstract1
Introduction4
Policy Regarding H1B Visa6
Policy Analysis6
H-IB program: Pitfalls for Immigrant and Domestic It Workers6
Institutes of immigration policy up to 20039
Policy Explanation10
The Reform of Institutions of Immigration Policy10
The main areas of immigration policy in the U.S.15
DOE project with the Caribbean Teachers15
Caribbean education15
Caribbean education in the Colonial Period16
Caribbean education in the Post independence Period, 1776 to the Mid-1800s17
Caribbean education in the mid- and Late Nineteenth Century18
Caribbean education in the Twentieth Century20
Impact of Caribbean education on American Society21
Entry into the U.S22
Family Reunification25
Labor Migration26
Students28
The "ethnic diversity"29
Refugees29
Illegal immigration30
Further Analysis: Neo-Liberal Economic Priorities31
Neo-Liberal Governance and Immigration36
Policing Non-Immigrant Flows40
Conclusion and Discussion45
References50
Bibliography59
Appendix61
It Labor Shortage: Fact or Fiction?61
IT Industry Arguments for Increasing the H- I B Cap64
No shortage of IT workers68
The Expansion and Stratification of Non-Immigrant Flows71
H1B Visa Policy
Introduction
The H l B visa program was created as a channel to facilitate temporary, skilled immigration to the United States, and has now become the center of a charged political debate. This debate, between information technology (IT) industry executives and H l B foes, largely has focused on whether to increase the visa cap to alleviate what the industry describes as a shortage of domestic IT labor. I argue, however, that this debate obscures fundamental flaws in the Hl B program that deserve greater attention. These flaws privilege the IT industry at the expense of H l B holders and domestic IT workers, and should be remedied to ensure that both business and labor abide by free market principles. The employers' ability to hire globally must be balanced by workers' rights to seek out better opportunities.
The HlB program expands the labor supply of IT workers, but at the same time restricts the ability of H -1B holders to compete in an open market. This is because workers who hold H-IB visas are bound to a specific employer for the duration of their six-year visa. As a result, employers can abuse the program by paying a salary often below market value. Moreover, this restriction indirectly affects the wages and job security of domestic IT workers because employers can threaten to replace them with cheaper, temporary immigrant labor. In this article, I examine industry claims of a shortage of domestic IT labor, as well as efforts to ...